Skip to main content
iRubric: Emerson's Got Talent Judging Form rubric

iRubric: Emerson's Got Talent Judging Form rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Emerson's Got Talent Judging Form 
Talent Show Judging
Rubric Code: JX25B8B
By lmoss1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Talent Show Judging
Criteria made to assist all the judges with their decisions on their ratings for each performer.
  Poor/Not Acceptable

Not a very good effort, a lot of work is needed.

10 pts

Fair/ Needs Work

A satisfying effort, that could be better.

20 pts

Good

An overall good effort, that perhaps needs some minor adjustments.

30 pts

Excellent!

An effort that exceeds expectations and is just brilliant!

40 pts

Overall Performance

A judgement on the contestant's ability to present original material that draws a positive response from the audience with personality, originality and poise.
Poor/Not Acceptable

The performance was boring, and there were multiple improvements that could have been made.
Fair/ Needs Work

The performance could be better but overall it was slightly amusing and contestants put forth a good effort.
Good

Very entertaining, the performance was fun and carried out very well, although they might have had a few minor errors or things that could be improved but overall it was still sensational!
Excellent!

FANTASTIC! Performer(s) achieved all expectations and, performance was neat and appeared to be well rehearsed and organized and just fabulous on the whole!
Audience Response

This judgement is not based solely on the final applause after the performance, Rather, it is judged based on the ability of the contestant to draw the audience into the performance, eliciting a positive response.
Poor/Not Acceptable

The performer(s) doesn't draw the audience in at all in the performance. Therefore, the audience is not amused, in fact they appear quite bored.
Fair/ Needs Work

The performance caught the crowd's attention to some degree, and received a fairly positive response from the audience in return.
Good

The performance drew the audience in therefore The crowd is enjoyed the performance. The performance received a good positive response from the crowd.
Excellent!

The crowd loved the performer(s) and the performers loved the crowd! The performer(s) beautifully drew the crowd in, and earned a wonderful response from the audience.
Stage Appearance and Presence

A judgement on the performer(s) attitude, including their originality personality, confidence, their eye contact with the audience and professionalism (their reaction to mistakes, giggling during the performance, etc.) Also a judgement on their overall appearance's display.
Poor/Not Acceptable

The performer(s) presented themselves unorganized and messy. Sometimes they weren't in character. Along with that no, or very small amounts of personality, originality and confidence was shown. Also, there was barely any eye contact if any, and there is a lot of room for improvement.
Fair/ Needs Work

The performer(s) presented themselves slightly neatly, and cleanly, and in character. Little personality, confidence and originality was showcased, along with, some eye contact towards the audience. There is room for improvement.
Good

The performers(s) presented themselves neatly and cleanly, and in character. They were original and showcased confidence and personality and had good eye contact with the audience.
Excellent!

The performer(s) presented themselves very neatly, cleanly, and in character, with a lot of confidence, personality and originality. Also they had good eye contact with the audience. They just gave off a very upbeat and amusing vibe. They exceeded expectations.
Originality/Creativity

The performer(s) ability to create a piece of work that is distinctive or different from the other performers. It takes creativity, ingenuity, confidence and personality to present an original piece.
Poor/Not Acceptable

The performance had many aspects of things that have been done before. Overall it wasn't very original and new.The performance exhibits very little creativity whatsoever.
Fair/ Needs Work

Some material in the performance were original and showcased creativity although few things have been repeated, along with that, a few adjustments are necessary. There were some aspects of creativity in the performance.
Good

The performance was very original, and the work was distinctive among the other performances. Although one or two things could be described as cliche. The performance was creative.
Excellent!

The performance showcased originality, it had new material that wasn't seen before and that was distinctive from the other performances. Act was completely creative and unique. The act ROCKED!
Preparedness/Organization

This is a judgement on purely the organization of the performance. For example, was the spacing off in the performance, or were words forgotten in the performance, or were dancers coordinated?
Poor/Not Acceptable

Act lacked organization and preparedness. The performance seemed like it wasn't too rehearsed.
Fair/ Needs Work

Act had some organization and preparedness. Although, improvement was still required. The performance seemed to be slightly rehearsed.
Good

Act was organized and prepared almost fully. Act still needed some tweaking. The act showed potential. The performance appeared to have been practiced a few times.
Excellent!

Act was completely organized and coordinated. The performance appeared to be well rehearsed.
Audience Behavior
Please subtract points if any of the following degrees of negative audience behavior are exemplified.
  extreme misbehaviors

DEDUCT

30 pts

some misbehaviors

DEDUCT

20 pts

minor misbehaviors

DEDUCT

10 pts

no major misbehaviors

DEDUCT

0 pts

Audience Behavior

This is based on how the performers participate as audience members while waiting to perform/after performing.
extreme misbehaviors

The performer talked while others performed, constantly got out of his or her seat and was overall rude while others performed. The performer showed signs of unsportsmanlike conduct by booing/laughing at or making fun of fellow performers. The performer did not fix behavior even after being reminded by an adult of his or her responsibilities as a performer.
some misbehaviors

The performer talked some while others performed, got out of his or her seat a few times and was somewhat rude while others performed. The performer got out of his or her seat The performer may or may not have shown signs of unsportsmanlike conduct by booing/laughing at or making fun of fellow performers. The performer corrected his or her behavior after being reminded by an adult of his or her responsibilities.
minor misbehaviors

The performer exhibited some minor misbehavior's, such as minimal talking getting out of his or her seat. The performer did not show any signs of unsportsmanlike conduct to other performers.
no major misbehaviors

The performer did not show any obvious signs of rude behavior while others performed. The performer sat in his or her seat, kept talking to a minimum.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98