Skip to main content
iRubric: Process Analysis Powerpoint /Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Process Analysis Powerpoint /Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Process Analysis Powerpoint /Presentation Rubric 
Process Analysis Powerpoint /Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code: HX935W6
By mckeonbe
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Process Analysis Essay
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

7 pts

Poor

6 pts

Introduction/Attention Getter

Excellent

Catches the audience's attention. Gives the listener a reason to be interested in this process. Makes a strong connection to the audience.
Good

Generally grabs the audience's interest. Provides some details that help to connect to audience.
Fair

Sets a basic framework for the backstory of the presentation.
Poor

No real attention grabber - or a very simple one. Speaker more or less simply states the purpose of the presentation and jumps into the steps.
Thesis/Goal

Excellent

Audience knows clearly what the goal of the presentation is and what the final product should look like.
Good

Audience knows generally what the goal of the presentation is and what the final product should look like.
Fair

Audience knows the goal of the presentation or what the final product should look like - more details might be necessary.
Poor

Goal is suggested or missing altogether.
Background

Excellent

Any necessary
background/context/
ingredients given in detail
including alternatives, sources, things to avoid.
Good

Any necessary
background/context/
ingredients given in detail
Fair

Some background/
context/ingredients given; some elements may be missing or incomplete
Poor

Little, if any,
background/context/
ingredients given --no detail, or too generic.
Organization

Excellent

Organized step by step, in logical order. Audience should easily be able to understand and be able to replicate the process. Each step has a clear topic followed by clear secondary details.
Good

Organized step by step, in chronological order. Each new step is clearly stated. Details are present.
Fair

Organization is clear. Some sentences and/or details may be hard to follow.
Poor

No clear order. Topics are missing. Details do not back up main points. Audience would not be able to repeat the process.
Steps - Transitions

Excellent

Steps/ideas seamlessly connected with strong transitions. Relationships between steps/ideas clearly established.
Good

Steps/ideas connected with clear transitions. Some relations ship between steps/ideas established.
Fair

Some connection between steps/ideas - transitions may be basic in nature.
Poor

Little, if any,transitions used –or transitions are used incorrectly.
Conclusion

Excellent

Conclusion is effective and gives audience a sense of closure. Thesis is restated, all major points are revisited.
Good

Conclusion is present, gives audience a sense of closure. Thesis is restated.
Fair

Conclusion is present but not effective. It does not provide closure for the audience.
Poor

Conclusion is not present.
Language Use

Excellent

Words are vivid, engaging, appropriate for topic. Sentences flow well.
Good

Words are interesting, appropriate for topic Generally, sentences flow well.
Fair

Words may be bland, or used incorrectly – they communicate meaning, but that’s about it.
Poor

Words are repetitive, or basic, or perhaps used incorrectly –
language does not
connect well with audience. Presentation is somewhat incoherent.
Poise

Excellent

Student displays relaxed,
self-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.
Good

Makes minor mistakes, but
quickly recovers from them; displays little or no tension.
Fair

Displays mild tension; has
trouble recovering from
mistakes.
Poor

Tension and nervousness is obvious; has trouble
recovering from mistakes.
Eye Contact

Excellent

Holds attention of entire
audience with the use of
direct eye contact, seldom
looking at notes.
Good

Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes.
Fair

Displayed minimal eye
contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes.
Poor

No eye contact with
audience, as entire report is read from notes.
Elocution

Excellent

Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise
pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Good

Student’s voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most
audience members can hear presentation.
Fair

Student’s voice is low. Student incorrectly
pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Poor

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for a majority of students to hear.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Add to Gallery

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16