Skip to main content
iRubric: FSA Rubric for Argumentative Writing

iRubric: FSA Rubric for Argumentative Writing

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
FSA Rubric for Argumentative Writing 
Rubric Code: HX4X4XX
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Grades 6–11 Argumentation Text-base
  4

4 pts

3

3 pts

2

2 pts

1

1 pts

0

0 pts

Purpose, Focus, and Organization (4

4

The response is fully sustained and consistently focused within the
purpose, audience, and task; and it has a clear claim and effective
organizationalstructure creating coherence and completeness. The
response includes most of the following:
 Strongly maintained claim with little or no loosely related
material
 Clearly addressed alternate or opposing claims*
 Skillful use of a variety of transitionalstrategiesto clarify the
relationships between
3

The response is adequately sustained and generally focused within
the purpose, audience, and task; and it has a clear claim and
evident organizationalstructure with a sense of completeness. The
response includes most of the following:
 Maintained claim, though some loosely related material may
be present
 Alternate or opposing claimsincluded but may not be
completely addressed*
 Adequateuse of a variety of transitional strategies to
clarif
2

The response is somewhatsustained within the purpose, audience,
and task but may include loosely related or extraneous material;
and it may have a claim with an inconsistent organizational
structure. The response may include the following:
 Focused claim but insufficiently sustained or unclear
 Insufficiently addressed alternate or opposing claims*
1

The response is related to the topic but may demonstrate little or
no awareness of the purpose, audience, and task; and it may have
no discernible claim and little or no discernible organizational
structure. The response may include the following:
 Absent, confusing, or ambiguous claim
 Missing alternate or opposing claims*
 Few or no transitionalstrategies
 Frequent extraneousideasthat impede understanding
 Too brief to demonstrate knowledge
0
Evidence and Elaboration (4-point R

4

The response providesthorough, convincing, and
credible support, citing evidence for the writer’s claim
that includesthe effective use of sources, facts, and
details. The response includes most of the following:
 Smoothly integrated,thorough, and relevant
evidence, including precise referencesto sources
 Effective use of a variety of elaborative
techniquesto support the claim
 Clear and effective expression of ideas, using
precise language
3

The response provides adequate support, citing
evidence for the writer’s claim that includes the use of
sources, facts, and details. The response includes most
of the following:
 Generally integrated and relevant evidence from
sources, though referencesmay be general or
imprecise
 Adequate use of some elaborative techniques
 Adequate expression of ideas, employing a mix of
precise and general language
2

The response provides uneven, cursory
support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes
partial use of sources, facts, and details. The response
may include the following:
 Weakly integrated evidence from sources;
erratic or irrelevantreferences or citations
 Repetitive or ineffective use of elaborative
techniques
 Impreciseor simplistic expression of ideas
 Some use of inappropriate domain-specific
vocabulary
 Mostsenten
1

The response providesminimalsupport/evidence for
the writer’s claim, including little if any use of sources,
facts, and details. The responsemay include the
following:
 Minimal, absent, erroneous, or irrelevant
evidence or citationsfrom the source material
 Expression of ideasthat is vague, unclear, or
confusing
 Limited and often inappropriate language or
domain-specific vocabulary
 Sentenceslimited to simple constructions
0
Conventions of Standard English

4
3
2

The response demonstrates an
adequate command of basic
conventions. The responsemay include
the following:
 Some minor errorsin usage but no
patterns of errors
 Adequate use of punctuation,
capitalization,sentence formation,
and spelling
1

The response demonstrates a partial
command of basic conventions. The
response may include the following:
 Various errorsin usage
 Inconsistent use of correct
punctuation, capitalization,
sentence formation, and spelling
0

The response demonstrates a lack of
command of conventions, with
frequent and severe errors often
obscuringmeaning.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16