- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Portfolio FR3381 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Portfolio FR3381 Reading aloud Rubrics used to grade the portfolio asssignments produced by students in FR3381 spring 2015 Rubric Code: HX3W22C By flemoine Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Homework Grade Levels: Undergraduate

CATEGORY
	Excellent A 5 pts	Good B 4 pts	Fair C 3 pts	Poor D 2 pts	Unacceptable F 1 pts
Minimum requirements	Excellent Produced all the required artifacts. portfolio goals Charlie Hebdo assignment portfolio 2 assignment portfolio 3 assignment reflections	Good Produced some of the required work, but one artifact/reflection is missing or was rushed.	Fair More than one piece is missing, and/or more than one pieces of work were clearly rushed	Poor more than 2 pieces are missing. Some of the work was very rushed. Short cuts were used (copy/paste from the internet, google translate, etc)	Unacceptable more than 3 pieces are missing and/or most of the work is boshed up.
Proficiency	Excellent Work produced is at a B1 level or above. The language in the artifacts is clear and perfectly comprehensible. 4 skills are excellent (speaking, listening, reading, writting)	Good Clarity is there but errors hinder comprehension in some of the artifacts. One of the 4 skills is weaker than the others, but overall the proficiency level is good.	Fair Errors in the language make it difficult to understand. One or more of the 4 skills is weak.	Poor Errors make it very hard to understand. Some of the skills are OK.	Unacceptable Language totally uncomprehensible. Difficulties in 4 skills.
Progression	Excellent Student showed clear improvements over the semester. Deadlines were respected which made it easier to judge the progression over the semester.	Good Student showed some improvement. Or, deadlines were somewhat respected, but nor entirely	Fair Student showed little improvement or deadlines were not really respected.	Poor No improvement. Or students did not respect the deadlines.	Unacceptable Impossible to judge because everything was posted in TRACS at the last minute
Presentation	Excellent Work was presented in a very professional manner. Use of visual and audio to convey the information (e.g. class presentation + information written in a document or a powerpoint)	Good An effort was made, but the presentation was not very professional	Fair Small effort	Poor Smaller effort	Unacceptable Made no effort.