Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: W200 ePortfolio - Fall 2013 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
W200 ePortfolio - Fall 2013
Rubric Code:
HB5C39
By
educw200student
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Introductory Pages
Missing
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Home Page
Missing
Poor
-Welcome message is poorly written, and not written for an adult audience
-Purpose of ePortfolio pages are not described
-Creative commons license not applied
Fair
-Welcome message is decently written, and written to an adult audience
-Purpose of each ePortfolio page is described
-Visually appealing
-Creative commons license applied
Good
-Welcome message is well written, and written with teachers and administrators as the audience
-Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is described
-Visually appealing
-Creative commons license applied
Great
-Welcome message is professional in content, and written with teachers and administrators as the audience
-Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is described
-Visually appealing
-Creative commons license applied
Excellent
- Welcome message is professional in content and tone, and is written with teachers and administrators as the audience
- Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is well described
-Description of pages includes links to those pages
- Visually appealing,
-Creative commons license is applied
About Me Page
Missing
Poor
- Unprofessional picture of you
- Required elements missing or poorly done
Fair
- Picture of you
- Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach)
(2) A statement concerning why you want to be a teacher
(3) Brief description of your pedagogical beliefs
(4) Brief description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom
(5) Embedded digital story with title and description
Good
- Good picture of you
- Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach)
(2) A statement concerning why you want to be a teacher
(3) Complete description of your pedagogical beliefs
(4) Complete description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom
(5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and description
Great
- Professional picture of you
- Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach)
(2) A well written statement concerning why you want to be a teacher
(3) Well written description of your pedagogical beliefs
(4) Well written description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom
(5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and description
Excellent
- Professional picture of you or equivalent [Points deducted for cropped images or inappropriate images ]
- Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach)
(2) Compelling statement concerning why you want to be a teacher
(3) Description of your defining pedagogical beliefs
(4) Detailed description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom
(5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and descri
Gallery Page
Missing
0 pts
Poor
3 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
9 pts
Great
12 pts
Excellent
15 pts
Enter Title
Missing
Poor
-Fewer than five examples of your best work
-Not all examples are public and published
-Not all examples have a linked title, screenshot/embed, -Some descriptions are missing
Fair
-Five examples of your best work
-All examples are public and published
-All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed. -For each example there is a description of its educational value
Good
-Five examples of your best work
-All examples are public and published
-All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a description, and a description of its educational value
Great
-Five examples of your best work; work is of high quality
-All examples are public and published
-All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a description, and a description of its educational value
Excellent
-Five or more examples of your best work; work is of high quality
-All examples are public and published
-All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a detailed description, and a well articulated defense of its educational value
Case Project/Service Learning
Missing
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Acceptable
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Enter Title
Missing
Poor
-One or more required elements are missing or incomplete
Fair
-Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page
-Artifacts are embedded, and have titles and descriptions
-Hyperlinks are active and documents are public
-Pages are not well organized
Acceptable
-Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page
-Artifacts are embedded, titled, and described
-Hyperlinks are active, documents are public
-Each page is somewhat organized
Good
-Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page
-Artifacts are embedded, and have descriptions and titles
-Hyperlinks are active and documents are public
-Each page is decently organized
Excellent
-Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page
-Artifacts are embedded, and have well-written descriptions and titles
-Hyperlinks are active and documents are public
-Each page is well organized
NETS-T Standards
Missing
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
1.5 pts
Good
2 pts
Great
2.5 pts
Excellent
3 pts
NETS-T 1
Missing
Poor
- 1 example of evidence for each standard
- Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit
Fair
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Minimal connections made between standard and example
Good
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard
Great
- 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard
-Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Excellent
-3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5
-Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 2
Missing
Poor
- 1 example of evidence for each standard
- Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit
Fair
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Minimal connections made between standard and example
Good
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard
Great
- 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard
-Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Excellent
-3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5
-Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 3
Missing
Poor
- 1 example of evidence for each standard
- Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit
Fair
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Minimal connections made between standard and example
Good
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard
Great
- 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard
-Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Excellent
-3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5
-Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 4
Missing
Poor
- 1 example of evidence for each standard
- Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit
Fair
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Minimal connections made between standard and example
Good
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard
Great
- 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard
-Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Excellent
-3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5
-Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 5
Missing
Poor
- 1 example of evidence for each standard
- Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit
Fair
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Minimal connections made between standard and example
Good
- 2 examples of evidence for each standard
- Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard
Great
- 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard
-Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Excellent
-3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5
-Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Professional Development
Missing
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Profiler Pro data and Analysis
Missing
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are missing
Poor
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present
-Strengths and weaknesses are minimally addressed
-Strengths and weaknesses are not based on the survey data
-No references to survey items
Fair
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present
-2 areas of strength and 2 areas of weaknesses are presented
-Strengths and weaknesses are based on the survey data
-References to survey items are minimal
Good
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present
-At least 3 strengths and 3 areas of improvements are presented
-Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data
-Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included
Great
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present
-At least 3 strengths and 3 areas of improvements are presented
-Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data
-Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included
Excellent
-Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present
-3 or more strengths and 3 or more areas of improvements are well described
-Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data
-Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included
Profile goals and evidence
Missing
Poor
- One PD goals, does not meet the SMART criteria
- Personal statement on whether goals have been met is missing or incomplete
- Evidences are not described
Fair
-Two PD goals that somewhat meet the SMART criteria, lacking one or more of the characteristics of SMART goal
- Personal statement on whether goals have been met is not well written
- Evidences are not described
Good
- Three PD goals mostly met the SMART criteria
-Personal statement on whether goals have been met is presented
-Evidences are described
Great
-Three PD goals have met the SMART criteria
-Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is detailed and specific
-Evidences are well described
Excellent
-Three PD goals explicitly meet the SMART criteria
-Personal statement on whether goals have been met is detailed, specific, and contains a future plan of action
-Evidences are described in detail
TIP #11: PLN
Missing
Poor
-Screenshot missing
-PLN Hyperlink reveals content not relevant to education
Fair
-Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN
-PLN Hyperlink reveals some education-related content
Good
-Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN
-PLN hyperlink reveals a PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to education topics
Great
-Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN
-PLN hyperlink reveals a PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to topics relevant to your teaching interests
Excellent
-Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN
-PLN hyperlink reveals a well developed PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to topics relevant to your teaching interests
TIP#12: LMS
Missing
Poor
-Missing screenshot, title, or minimal descriptions or comparisons of LMS
- Minimally completed descriptions or comparisons
Fair
-Title of the LMS you chose
-Screenshot of your course
-Description of the LMS option
-Minimal comparison of different features of the LMS with the one you use as an IU student
Good
-Title of the LMS you chose
-Screenshot of your course
-Description of the LMS option
-Some comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student
Great
-Title of the LMS you chose
-Screenshot of your course
-Description of the LMS option and how it can be used when teaching online
-Adequate comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student
Excellent
-Title of the LMS you chose
-Screenshot of your course
-Well written description of the LMS option and how it can be used when teaching online
-Detailed comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student
Formatting and Font
Missing
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Formatting, copyright
Missing
Poor
Overall format is poor, lacking any consideration for formatting and detail
-Spacing between blocks of text are irregular
-Numbered lists do not contain indents
-Font face, size, and color are not consistent nor readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links
Fair
Overall format is fair, but inconsistent with many missed details
-Spacing between blocks of text are sometimes irregular
-Numbered lists do not contain indents
-Font face, size, and color are not consistent nor readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links
Good
Overall format is acceptable but inconsistent:
-Spacing between blocks of text are mostly consistent
-Numbered lists are indented
-Font face, size, and color are fairly consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links
-Navigation box contains creative commons logo
Great
Page formatting is high quality
-Spacing between blocks of text are consistent
-Numbered lists are indented
-Font face, size, and color are consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links
-Navigation box contains creative commons logo
Excellent
Page formatting on all pages is flawless, consistent, and exceptionally completed
-Spacing between blocks of text are consistent
-Numbered lists are indented
-Font face, size, and color are consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links
Navigation box contains creative commons logo
Writing
Missing
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Writing mechanics
Missing
Poor
- Proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization is not present
- Proper pronouns are not used
- Writing is unprofessional or informal
Fair
- A range of spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted
- Proper pronouns are seldom used
- Writing is sometimes informal/not professional
Good
- Some spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted
- Proper pronouns are not always used
- Writing is sometimes informal/not professional
Great
- Very few spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization errors
- Proper nouns are used appropriately
- Writing is formal/professional
Excellent
- No spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors are found
- Appropriate use of proper nouns (e.g., Internet, Google, SMART Board, PowerPoint, etc...)
- Writing is strongly formal/professional (avoids contractions, abbreviations, “I feel/think”)
Overall quality
Missing
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Great
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Overal quality
Missing
Poor
The ePortfolio is not acceptable as professional, evidence for potential as a teacher is weak or incomplete.
Fair
The ePortfolio is less than professional, and evidence of potential is not strong
Good
The ePortfolio is somewhat professional and showing some evidence of one's potential as a teacher
Great
The ePortfolio is acceptably professional, and shows good evidence of one's potential as a teacher
Excellent
The ePortfolio is exceptionally professional and showing strong evidence of one's potential as a teacher
eBook Page
Missing
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Great
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
eBook links and description
Missing
eBook is missing, description is missing.
Poor
eBook is embedded or linked. Description is minimal.
Fair
eBook is embedded or linked. Description includes a summary of contents
Good
eBook is embedded or linked. Description includes a summary of the eBook's goals and contents
Great
eBook is embedded or linked. Page includes a description of the eBook's learning goals and a summary of contents, highlighting key features
Excellent
eBook is embedded or linked. Page includes a description of the eBooks' learning goals, and a description of how its design helps learners meet those goals, highlighting key features of the book
Keywords:
W200 Spring 2013 ePortfolio
Subjects:
Education
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.