Skip to main content
iRubric: Junior Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Junior Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Junior Research Paper 
Junior Research Paper Criteria
Rubric Code: HB4X26
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Junior Research Paper
  Exemplary (A)

20 pts

Good (B)

15 pts

Fair (C-D)

10 pts

Inadequate (D-F)

5 pts

Formatting & Resources

Minimum: 12 point, Times New Roman font, 4-6 Pages, in-text citations, Annotated Bibliography.

Exemplary (A)

Writer correctly formatted essay, provided EXTENSIVE in-text citations (more than ten) and used a variety of sources beyond those basic requirements.
Good (B)

Writer correctly formatted cover page, provided at least FIVE required in-text citations, and two or more sources to back up his/her information.
Fair (C-D)

Writer did not format one or more areas correctly. Writer may have omitted or incorrectly formatted some citations or did not correctly format the bibliography.
Inadequate (D-F)

Writer did not use proper formatting. Format is inconsistent enough to demonstrate the writer did not follow written/verbal directions regarding formatting.
Content

How well writer used knowledge from research to support his or her argumentation on the topic.

Exemplary (A)

The writing is purposefully clear and focused. It holds the reader's attention. Main ideas are supported by AMPLE and RELEVANT details suitable to the audience and purpose.
Good (B)

The writing is mostly focused and the reader can understand the main idea. Support is evident but it may be too GENERAL to maintain a persuasive focus.
Fair (C-D)

Ideas are somewhat unclear or the attempted development is too minimal, too simple, too irrelevant or incomplete
Inadequate (D-F)

The ideas are unclear, inconsistent, and/or lack a central theme or purpose.
Style

Writer aligns his/her style with the type of writing chosen. (Expressive/Informative/Analytical/Etc.)

Exemplary (A)

Writer COMPLETELY and FULLY understands the writing style they have chosen. The goal of the paper is clear, and the writer is successful at supporting their thesis.
Good (B)

Writer GENERALLY or PARTIALLY made an attempt to persuade the reader but was not fully successful in getting the reader to see another viewpoint. Use of language to achieve purpose was not consistent.
Fair (C-D)

The writer ATTEMPTED to persuade the reader but was not successful in using information to support the stated belief. It was evident the writer had trouble controlling topic and purpose together.
Inadequate (D-F)

The writer did not persuade the reader at all. It was evident the writer did not know how to use his or her opinion combined with facts to influence the reader.
Conventions

Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics

Exemplary (A)

The writing demonstrates STRONG control of standard writing conventions and uses them to effectively enhance communication. Errors are so few and minor, the reader can skim over them unless specifically searching for them. LITTLE editing is needed.
Good (B)

The writing demonstrates REASONABLE control of standard writing conventions. There may be a few errors, but they do not impede readability. SOME editing is needed.
Fair (C-D)

The writing demonstrates LIMITED control of standard writing conventions. Errors begin to impede upon readability. SIGNIFICANT editing is needed.
Inadequate (D-F)

The writing demonstrates little or no control of standard writing conventions. The severity and frequency of errors are so overwhelming that the reader finds it hard to focus on the message. The reader is constantly forced to reread for meaning. EXTENSIVE editing is needed.
Syntax/Word Choice

Syntax reflects the psycholinguistic levels of sentence construction.

Exemplary (A)

Words convey the intended mesaage in an INTERESTING, precise, and natural way appropriate to the audience and purpose.
Good (B)

The variety of words employed is FUNCTIONAL and appropriate to audience and purpose.
Fair (C-D)

Language is predictable, ordinary, and/or imprecise, and at times may note be appropriate for intended audience.
Inadequate (D-F)

Language is either limited and misused, or language is not that of a high school student and suggests the writer engaged in limited or extensive plagarism.



Keywords:
  • Argumentative Research Paper

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98