Survey Project
|
| |
Not Acceptable
1 pts
|
Poor
2 pts
|
Fair
3 pts
|
Good
4 pts
|
Excellent
5 pts
|
Topic /Question
|
Not Acceptable
Neither topic/question nor background is not stated.
|
Poor
Both the topic/questions and the background provided are flawed in at least one area.
OR
Either topic/question or background is missing.
|
Fair
The topic/question is flawed in either one of the areas: clearly stated or appropriateness for an abservational study.
OR
The background provided fails to provide support to this topic/question or is irrelevent to student's lives.
|
Good
The topic/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives adequate motivation for the group's choice of this topic/question and is somewhat relevent to student's lives.
|
Excellent
The topice/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives strong motivation for the group's choice of this topic/questions and its relevence to student's lives.
|
Methodolgy-Randomization
|
Not Acceptable
The randomization is flawed in all three area - labeling, number selection , and results
OR
Method is missing from report.
|
Poor
There is some flaw in the randomization procedure itself. Some aspect of the randomization-labeling, number selction, or results is completely correct.
|
Fair
The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right but the randomization process does not match the chosen sampling procedure.
OR
The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure, but the clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of this randomization, in spite of it being correctly designed and implemented.
|
Good
The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right. However, clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of thei randomization. The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.
|
Excellent
The randomization process includes a clear and correct labeling of subjects, a description of the number selection process (random number table or calculator), and the results of the randomization (i.e. the numbers and subjects chosen). In addition the randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.
|
The Survey and Questions
|
Not Acceptable
Survey questions are unclear and show distinct bias. Questions are missing from report and have never been submitted.
|
Poor
Survey questions not pre-tested, but are somewhat clear and relatively unbaised.
OR
Question are not included in the report and had not been previously OKed.
|
Fair
Survey questions have been pre-tested, but not completely refined or show some bias.
OR
Questions are not included in the report but have been previously submitted and OKed.
|
Good
Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are unbiased, but somewhat unclear.
|
Excellent
Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are clear and unbiased.
Survey questions are included in the appredix of the report.
|
Data Recording and Summarization
|
Not Acceptable
Original data is not available for review and the data is not tabulated appropriately.
|
Poor
Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized partially correct in a table.
OR
Original data are available for review but the table is not accurate.
|
Fair
Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized neatly, accurately and are clearly labeled.
OR
Original data are available for review, but there is a major flaw in the presentation of the data (but not in the accuracy of the tally).
|
Good
Original data are availabe for review and summarized in appropriate table form. The tables however minor errors, sloppy, or not clearly labeled.
|
Excellent
Original data are available for review and are summarized in an appropriate table form. Tables are neat, clearly labeled and accurate.
|
Graphical and Numberical Summaries
|
Not Acceptable
Neither the graphical nor the numberical summaries are appropriate.
|
Poor
Data has been correctly summarized graphically or numberically but not both.
Or
One of the data summaries is inappropriate.
|
Fair
Data has been correctly summarized either graphically or numberically but there is a major error in one of the components.
|
Good
Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/ percentages, but has made a minor error in either computation or graphing.
|
Excellent
Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/
percentages. Graphs are accurate, labeled appropriately and neat
|
Interpretation of Data
|
Not Acceptable
Interpretations and generalizations are missing.
|
Poor
Interpretations are attempted but are inadequate. Generalizations concerning the population of interest are omitted.
|
Fair
Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have serious errors/omissions. In addition, an attempt is made at addressing generalization concerning the population of interest.
|
Good
Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have minor errors or omissions. In addition some generalizations concerning the population of interst are identify.
|
Excellent
Interpretations of the graphical and numerical summaries are thorough and accurate. In addition, generalizations concerning the population of interest are identified.
|
Pitfalls and Extenstions
|
Not Acceptable
Encountered pitfalls is not discusses nor are any plausible extensions given.
|
Poor
Encountered pitfalls are articulated but no explanation concerning how these were dealt with is given
AND
No plausible extension of the project is given.
|
Fair
Some encountered pitfallas are articulated with a brief explanation of how these were dealt with
OR
No plausible extension of the project is given.
|
Good
Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated, but explanations concerning how these were dealt with are unclear.
AND
One plausible extension of the project is given.
|
Excellent
Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated along with explanations of how these pitfalls where dealt with.
AND
One plausible extension of the project is given.
|
English Mechanic
|
Not Acceptable
Writing is deficient in all four areas: grammar, punctuation,spelling, flow.
|
Poor
Writing is flawed in two or three areas: grammar, punctuation, spelling, flow.
|
Fair
Significant errors in one of the areas: grammar, punctutation, spelling or flow.
OR
Minor erros in two areas.
|
Good
Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated properly, and flow locially from one point to the next, except for minor errors in one of these categories. No speling mistakes!!
|
Excellent
Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated propertly, and flow logically from one pont to the next. No spelling mistakes!!
|
Peer Evaluation
|
Not Acceptable
Received an F average from group members.
|
Poor
Received an D average from group members.
|
Fair
Received an C average from group members.
|
Good
Received an B average from group members.
|
Excellent
Received an A average from group members.
|
Ready to use
Public Rubric
RCampus
twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
email a friend
help on this page