Skip to main content
iRubric: Multimedia Project for Public Safety Academy rubric

iRubric: Multimedia Project for Public Safety Academy rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Multimedia Project for Public Safety Academy 
Design a multimedia project of your choice that: •uses a multimedia program •includes cooperative groups •includes research to find information or data •includes a presentation of information. When selecting multimedia keep in mind the due date for the project and how well your presentation can inform and address all areas of the rubric.
Rubric Code: H3A3BX
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Multimedia Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Deadlines

Poor

Only final presentation deadline was met.
Fair

Some deadlines were met but tasks were not well defined.
Good

All deadlines were met but tasks were not well defined.
Excellent

Deadline for topic choice, individual tasks and presentation was met.
Mulltimedia Application

Poor

Students used a form of multimedia but did not take advantage of creative and effective tools available. Project seems quickly put together and disorganized.
Fair

Students used a form of multimedia to display data and research. Students did not present data or research in the best format to show results.
Good

Students made full use of a form of multimedia and its capabilities as needed to display data and research. Use of multimedia was not utilized in the best possible way to present the data.
Excellent

Students made full use of a form of multimedia and its capabilities as needed to display data and research. Use of multimedia was not a distraction but an aide in the presentation of data.
Group Work

Poor

Students were assigned group work but worked as individuals. Entire group did not work together to complete project. Work was assigned to one or two individuals to complete.
Fair

Students worked in a group. Specific student responsibilities were at times misunderstood or unclear. Perhaps students had a hard time establishing roles. Communication and cooperation failed at times.
Good

Students worked in a group setting where tasks were divided up equally, jobs were understood and cooperation and communication was maintained most of the time.
Excellent

Students worked in a group setting where tasks were divided up equally, jobs were understood and cooperation and communication was maintained at all times.
Research and Data

This category counts twice in overall grade of project.

Poor

Research was sparse. Data found was borrowed or irrelevant to topic.
Fair

Students performed research and presented data. Not all data was displayed in the most proper format. Not all information included was correct. Sources perhaps were not all credible or well documented.
Good

Research and data was thorough and cohesive. Data was processed and displayed appropriately. Perhaps some information is lacking or incorrect. Sources included are credible and documented.
Excellent

Research and data was thorough and cohesive. Data was processed and displayed appropriately and correctly. Sources included are credible and documented.
Presentation

Poor

Presentation was lacking. Effort was not informative or clearly communicated.
Fair

Presentation was missing some key information. Perhaps not all individuals participated in presentation.
Good

Presentation was complete. Perhaps all individuals did not participate in presentation.
Excellent

Presentation was clear and thorough. All individuals from group participated in presentation. Media aided presentation but did not drive presentation. Presentation contained all information needed.
Integration of courses

Poor

Not all courses were included in project. Connections to Public Safety were lacking.
Fair

All courses were included in the project. Connections for Public Safety were lacking.
Good

All courses were included in the project. Connections to Public Safety were obvious and supported by the research.
Excellent

All courses were included in the project. Connections to Public Safety were obvious and well supported by the research. Examples were used to support the connections.
Individual grade

Each group member may receive a different grade in this category

Poor

Individual member did not participate much in creating and presenting the project. Group member was absent during creation or presentation.
Fair

Group member participated in creating and presenting the project. Other group members appeared to do a much larger portion of the work.
Good

Group member participated in creating and presenting the project. Other group members appeared to do a larger portion of the work.
Excellent

Group member played a key role in creating and presenting the project.
Creativity

Poor

Project was original but lacked overall creativity
Fair

Project was original and showed little creativity
Good

Project was original and showed creativity
Excellent

Project was original and showed a lot of creativity.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16