Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Summary/Individual Summary rubric

iRubric: Group Summary/Individual Summary rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Summary/Individual Summary 
-Used in assessing Summary Essays.
Rubric Code: GXX874W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Needs Improvement

10 pts

Adequate

14 pts

Proficient

16 pts

Excelling

20 pts

Content & Development

supporting materials and ideas

Needs Improvement

- Content is incomplete.
-Missing research.
-Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
-Most of the research stands alone (with little explanation from author) and/or assignment is too reliant on outside research.
Adequate

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is inadequate or does not address main points or thesis.
-Much of the research stands alone (with little explanation from author)
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Proficient

- Content is accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated and are somewhat supported.
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses main points and thesis and is introduced and explained by the author.
- Content and purpose of the writing are mostly clear.
Excelling

Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Research is extensive, timely and addresses main points and thesis
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Quality of Information

Needs Improvement

Information not from the time period.
Adequate

-Information represents the time period but missing major events.
Proficient

-Information clearly represents the time period, but presentation did not give a feeling of life at that time
Excelling

-Information clearly represents the time period.
-Includes major events along with culture of the time.
Organization & Structure

organization of paper and paragraphs

Needs Improvement

Information in the
assignment is disorganized,
and not logically or
effectively structured.
-Paragraphs are not
well-constructed.
Sentences are not
related within
paragraphs.
Adequate

Most information in
the assignment is well-organized,
with some
well-constructed
paragraphs. Some
paragraphs include an
introductory
sentence,
explanations or
details, and a
concluding sentence.
Proficient

Information in the
assignment is well organized,
with well constructed
paragraphs.
-Good
connections among
ideas are made.
-Most
paragraphs include an
introductory
sentence,
explanations or
details, a
concluding sentence/impact and a transition.
Excelling

Information in the
assignment is logically and
creatively organized
and flows smoothly,
with unity and
coherence.
-Evident,
and smooth
transitions
throughout.
-All
paragraphs include an
introductory
sentence, explanation
or details, and a
concluding sentence/impact.
Format (includes images)

MLA format

Needs Improvement

- assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- assignment is over/ under word length.
-Student needs to use
greater care in
documenting sources.
Format is used
correctly only some
of the time. Some
sources are not
accurately
documented.
Adequate

- assignment follows most guidelines.

- assignment is over/ under word length.

Student attempted to
document sources,
but many are not in
MLA/Chicago/APA format.
Some citations are
used improperly,
and/or some lead-ins
are incorrectly done.
Proficient

- assignment is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Student attempted to
document sources,
but some are not in
MLA/Chicago/APA format.
Some citations are
used improperly,
and/or some lead-ins
are incorrectly done.
Excelling

- assignment is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Student documented
sources with great
care. All sources are
accurately and
uniformly
documented in MLA or Chicago format.
Citations are used
properly where
needed. Lead-ins are
done correctly.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

Needs Improvement

Student shows very
little mastery of
mechanics.
Numerous errors in
capitalization,
punctuation, spelling,
and grammar greatly
interfere with
meaning. Many pronoun/antecedent agreement problems. Slang,
and/or pronouns are frequently used.
Adequate

-Student shows
average mastery of
mechanics. Although
errors in spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammar are evident,
the meaning mostly remains
clear. Some pronoun/antecedent agreement problems. Some slang,
and/or personal pronouns are
be used.
Proficient

Student shows above average
mastery of
mechanics. Spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammatical errors
are minor and do not interfer with meaning. Few pronoun/antecedent agreement problems. No slang, or pronouns (I, me, my, mine, etc.) are used.
Excelling

Student shows
excellent mastery of
mechanics. Spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammar are correct. No pronoun/antecedent agreement problems.
No slang, or personal
pronouns (I, me, my,
mine, etc.) are used.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16