Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Video Journalism rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Video Journalism
This is a rubric for the video project that is part of the photojournalism class at San Joaquin Delta College in Stockton, California.
Rubric Code:
GXA6W5B
By
hpitto
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Video Journalism
Unsatisfactory
0 pts
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Editing/Format
Unsatisfactory
Video was not edited in Adobe Premiere Pro CC or final video is not in QuickTime or mp4 format.
AUTOMATIC ZERO/FAILURE ON THE ASSIGNMENT.
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
N/A
Excellent
Video was edited in Adobe Premiere Pro CC and final video is in QuickTime or mp4 format.
Personal Connection
Unsatisfactory
There is a personal connection to the assignment thus creating a conflict of interest.
AUTOMATIC ZERO/FAILURE ON THE ASSIGNMENT.
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
N/A
Excellent
There is not a personal connection to the assignment.
Ex: It's not a class or activity you're involved in a group of your friends, etc.
Natural Sound
Unsatisfactory
Video is completely narrated and devoid of natural sound.
Poor
Video is partially narrated in addition to the natural sound or people talking in the background.
Fair
Video has mostly sound of people talking in the background and lacks natural sound, although it is still present.
Good
Video has mostly natural sound and some sounds of people talking in background (not narration).
Excellent
Video only has natural sound.
Subject
Unsatisfactory
Video does not have one, clear, identifiable subject.
Poor
Video appears to have multiple main subjects.
Fair
Video has one, clear subject, but they are mostly not identifiable.
You mostly never see their face, and they are not named in a lower third.
Good
Video has one, clear subject, but they are somewhat not identifiable.
You mostly never see their face, but they are named in a lower third.
Excellent
Video has one, clear, identifiable subject.
** If the video is about animals, then there can/should be more than one animal.
Lower Third(s)
Unsatisfactory
All lower third(s) missing.
Poor
There is only one lower third, and it is not in the proper format.
Fair
There is only one lower third, but it is in the proper format.
Good
Both sets of lower thirds are present, but formatting is wrong.
Excellent
There is an opening lower third with your name and title (Photojournalism student) on two separate lines. Your name is larger than your title.
Ex: Haley Pitto
Photojournalism instructor
There is a lower third for your video's main subject (if they are not an animal) as well.
Length
Unsatisfactory
Video is less than 1:50 or more than 2:10 in length.
(The above length is in minutes and seconds)
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
N/A
Excellent
Video is 1:50-2:10 in length.
(The above length is in minutes and seconds)
Location
Unsatisfactory
Video is not located in Stockton and does not have a Delta connection.
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
N/A
Excellent
Video is located in Stockton or has a Delta connection.
Panning and Zooming
Unsatisfactory
Video is filled with pans and/or zooms.
Poor
There are several pans and/or zooms.
Fair
Video has more than two pans and/or zooms.
Good
Video is almost entirely without pans and/or zooms (1-2 present).
Excellent
Video is devoid of pans and/or zooms.
Stability
Unsatisfactory
Video is not stable; it is clear that a tripod was not used.
Poor
Video is mostly unstable.
Fair
Video is partially stable. A tripod was used only half of time.
Good
Video is mostly stable. A tripod was used most of the time.
Excellent
Video is stable; it is clear that a tripod was used.
DEADLINE
Unsatisfactory
Video is not on the MCOM7 server under the file with your name by the April 23 1:30 p.m. deadline.
AUTOMATIC ZERO/FAILURE ON THE ASSIGNMENT.
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
N/A
Excellent
Video is on the MCOM7 server under the file with your name by the April 23 1:30 p.m. deadline. (20 points)
Subjects:
Journalism
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Journalism rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.