- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Compare & Contrast Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Compare & Contrast Presentation Rubric Compare & Contrast Presentation Rubric This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions. Rubric Code: GX8AC24 By rpilsing Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Group Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Organization	Excellent Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Content	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge. Four or more concepts were used to compare & contrast the two countries.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors. Three concepts were used to compare & contrast the two countries.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation. Two concepts were used to compare & contrast the two countries.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation. Only one concept was used to compare and contrast the two countries.
Visual Aid(s)	Excellent Visual aids used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used visual aids as a supplement, not as a crutch.	Good Visual aids used were somewhat effective. One or two students relied on the visual aid to present information.	Fair Visual aids used did not support verbal presentation. They lacked information, or most of the groups members read from them.	Poor Visual aids were not used at all.