Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Making a Murderer Debate Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Making a Murderer Debate Rubric
The Great Debate - Tuck Everlasting
Rubric Code:
GX7BA66
By
illyjan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate
A
4 pts
C
3 pts
55
2 pts
45
1 pts
Opening Statement
A
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 2 major points
C
Opening statement vaguely defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 2 major points.
55
Opening statement may or may not vaguely define the viewpoint of the team and and does not briefly list their 2 major points.
45
Student was absent
Major Point 1
A
Point #1 accurately describes the forensic evidence and clearly ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
C
Point #1 vaguely describes the forensic evidence and vaguely ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
55
Point #1 does not describe the forensic evidence or it was omitted.
45
Student was absent
Major Point 2
A
Point #2 accurately describes the forensic evidence and clearly ties it to the viewpoint of the team
C
Point #2 vaguely describes the forensic evidence and vaguely ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
55
Point #1 does not describe the forensic evidence or it was omitted.
45
Student was absent
Rebuttal 1
A
Counter-argument #1 accurately used the forensic evidence presented and clearly tied it to the viewpoint of the team
C
Counter-argument #1 vaguely used the forensic evidence presented and vaguely tied it to the viewpoint of the team
55
Counter-argument #1 did not use the forensic evidence presented or was omitted.
45
Student was absent
Rebuttal 2
A
Counter-argument #2 accurately used the forensic evidence presented and clearly tied it to the viewpoint of the team.
C
Counter-argument #2 vaguely used the forensic evidence presented and vaguely tied it to the viewpoint of the team.
55
Counter-argument #2 did not use the forensic evidence presented or was omitted.
45
Student was absent
Concluding Statement
A
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly list their 2 major points.
C
Concluding statement vaguely sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly list their 2 major points.
55
Concluding statement does not sum up the viewpoint of the team and does not briefly list their two major points
45
Student was absent
Professionalism
A
All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate.
C
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate.
55
Statements and responses were not respectful and appropriate.
45
Student was absent
Performance
A
Team member's statements were easy to follow,
at an appropriate volume,
all team members were actively engaged on stage.
C
Team member's statements were somewhat easy to follow
may or may not be at an appropriate volume.
Some team members were actively engaged on stage, but not all.
55
Team members statement's were difficult to follow
not at an appropriate volume.
Team members were not actively engaged on stage
45
Student was absent
Subjects:
English
Science
Education
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.