Skip to main content
iRubric: Making a Murderer Debate Rubric

iRubric: Making a Murderer Debate Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Making a Murderer Debate Rubric 
Rubric Code: GX7BA66
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Debate
  A

4 pts

C

3 pts

55

2 pts

45

1 pts

Opening Statement

A

Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 2 major points
C

Opening statement vaguely defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 2 major points.
55

Opening statement may or may not vaguely define the viewpoint of the team and and does not briefly list their 2 major points.
45

Student was absent
Major Point 1

A

Point #1 accurately describes the forensic evidence and clearly ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
C

Point #1 vaguely describes the forensic evidence and vaguely ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
55

Point #1 does not describe the forensic evidence or it was omitted.
45

Student was absent
Major Point 2

A

Point #2 accurately describes the forensic evidence and clearly ties it to the viewpoint of the team
C

Point #2 vaguely describes the forensic evidence and vaguely ties it to the viewpoint of the team.
55

Point #1 does not describe the forensic evidence or it was omitted.
45

Student was absent
Rebuttal 1

A

Counter-argument #1 accurately used the forensic evidence presented and clearly tied it to the viewpoint of the team
C

Counter-argument #1 vaguely used the forensic evidence presented and vaguely tied it to the viewpoint of the team
55

Counter-argument #1 did not use the forensic evidence presented or was omitted.
45

Student was absent
Rebuttal 2

A

Counter-argument #2 accurately used the forensic evidence presented and clearly tied it to the viewpoint of the team.
C

Counter-argument #2 vaguely used the forensic evidence presented and vaguely tied it to the viewpoint of the team.
55

Counter-argument #2 did not use the forensic evidence presented or was omitted.
45

Student was absent
Concluding Statement

A

Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly list their 2 major points.
C

Concluding statement vaguely sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly list their 2 major points.
55

Concluding statement does not sum up the viewpoint of the team and does not briefly list their two major points
45

Student was absent
Professionalism

A

All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate.
C

Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate.
55

Statements and responses were not respectful and appropriate.
45

Student was absent
Performance

A

Team member's statements were easy to follow,

at an appropriate volume,

all team members were actively engaged on stage.
C

Team member's statements were somewhat easy to follow

may or may not be at an appropriate volume.

Some team members were actively engaged on stage, but not all.
55

Team members statement's were difficult to follow

not at an appropriate volume.

Team members were not actively engaged on stage
45

Student was absent





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16