Skip to main content
iRubric: Credo reflection paper rubric

iRubric: Credo reflection paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Credo reflection paper 
This is a rubric designed to measure a student's reflection on Credo submissions
Rubric Code: GX7B495
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Theology ReflectionPaper
This rubric is designed to evaluate a student's reflection on a theme
  Poor

A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer.

0 pts

Fair

The assigned category needs work.

1 pts

Good

There is a fair effort to do the reflection.

2.5 pts

Very Good

The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article.

4 pts

Excellent

The writer completely covers all required information.

5 pts

Observance of submission guidelines
25 %

Is able to submit on time and follow the guidelines/mechanics of submission (including the 7 categories of a Credo.)

Poor

Late submission and/or does not include or refer to any of the 7 categories of a Credo.)
Fair

Late submission and/or includes less than 50% references to the 7 categories of a Credo.)
Good

Late submission and/or includes less than 75% references to the 7 categories of a Credo.)
Very Good

Late submission and/or an item or two of the 7 categories of a Credo.)
Excellent

Submitted on time and includes references to all 7 of the categories of a Credo.)
Citation of a related text
5 %

Relates assigned text(s), theological teachings and principles from class materials are properly cited.

Poor

No attempt is made.
Fair

Related text is irrelevant. (There are numerous grammar and spelling errors.)
Good

The reference citation has more than one error as it is written.
Very Good

The reference citation has one error. (There are some spelling and grammar errors throughout the paper)
Excellent

No errors exist in the citation or in grammar and spelling.
Independent critical thinking
15 %

Uses logical and critical thinking in reflecting on theme and cited texts. Derives insights from texts/materials discussed in class.

Poor

No exercise of independent critical thinking at all.
Fair

Poor exercise of critical thinking.
Good

There is an average effort for critical thinking/analysis.
Very Good

One or more implications are given and are sufficently clarified.
Excellent

Implications are clearly explicated and demonstrate critical thinking skills
Personal experiences
25 %

The writer shares a personal experience where she applies theories and where she manifests grasp of theories discussed in class.

Poor

No personal experiences are given.
Fair

Personal experiences are poorly developed in the reflection.
Good

Effort to develop and reflect on personal experience(s) is just fair.
Very Good

Personal experiences are clearly mentioned and expanded on.
Excellent

The personal experiences of the writer are fully explained and related to the given theme or topic.
Theological reflection
30 %

Integrates the experience with related texts and insights derived from critical thinking.

Poor

No attempt to relate the experience with texts/materials/insights.
Fair

Very little attempt to integrate/synthesize (needs expounding)
Good

Needs to improve more on integrating/synthesizing experiences and theological insights.
Very Good

A very good attempt to integrate/synthesize experiences and insights.
Excellent

Integrates personal experiences and insights very well, and comes up with deep theological insights, thus, whether progressive or prescriptive.



Keywords:
  • theology, graduate, reflection







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16