Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Euthanasia in "The Giver" Debate rubric

iRubric: Euthanasia in "The Giver" Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Euthanasia in "The Giver" Debate "The Giver" Debate Assignment This debate is one of two benchmark assignments that will be conducted after reading our second novel. This debate will require that you work in designated groups to argue for or against Euthanasia, one of many controversial issues in the Giver. Group transcripts for this debate is due on February 09, 2017. This will be presented in the form of a debate, in class on February 10, 2017. If you have any further questions about this, see me after class about it. Rubric Code: GX7947X By tlmailangi Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Enter rubric title
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Poor 3 pts	Good 5 pts	Great 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Understanding of Topic	Needs Improvement The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic and did a poor job in presenting during debate.	Poor The team inconsistently showed some understanding of main points of the topic and presented with little efficiency.	Good The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.	Great The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.	Excellent The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Use of Evidence	Needs Improvement Every major point was not supported with facts from the novel.	Poor A few major points was supported with facts, from the novel, but facts were either irrelevant or inaccurate.	Good Every major point was supported with facts, from the novel, but the relevance or accuracy was sometimes questionable.	Great Every major point was supported with relevant and some accurate facts from the novel.	Excellent Every major point was well supported with relevant and accurate facts from the novel, facts from history and/or personal experiences.
Rebuttal	Needs Improvement Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position.	Poor Most counter-arguments were irrelevant, weak, but was able to make some attempt at defending position.	Good Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position.	Great Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position.	Excellent All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to accurately defend position.
Respect for Other Team	Needs Improvement Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently (3+) interrupted other team or talked over other team members.	Poor More than two statements and responses were somewhat respectful and appropriate. More than a few interruption of other teams or talked over other team members.	Good Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.	Great Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.	Excellent All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Oral Presentation During Debate	Needs Improvement Team members did not work together effectively therefore disrupting the overall debate presentation, which was also affected by a very poorly executed oral presentation of ideas during debate.	Poor Team members made an effort to work together however most times it was apparent that there was little cohesion and oral presentation of ideas during debate was poor.	Good Team members, on the most part, worked well together. Debate ideas were somewhat presented well with many glaring inconsistencies and mistakes made by team members.	Great Team members, on the most part, worked well together. Debate was great with a few glaring inconsistencies and mistakes made by team members.	Excellent Team members worked effectively together. Presentation was effective throughout the duration of the debate with very few to no inconsistencies and mistakes.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16