Skip to main content
iRubric: Culminating Project Rubric

iRubric: Culminating Project Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Culminating Project Rubric 
The completion of this portfolio is a culminating project for second year graduate students to document and reflect upon each of the nine KASA makers established by ASHA. Additionally, students will be judged on their ability to discuss two artifacts chosen for the portfolio and two questions provided in advance.
Rubric Code: GX476A5
By emlawski
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Portfolio Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

Macrostructure of portfolio

Poor

Missing more than 3 elements
Fair

Missing between1-3 elements
Good

All required elements present:3 inch binder, de-identified artifacts, table of contents, artifacts for each section, copies of transcripts (graduate and undergraduate), copy of code of ethics, copy of observation hours, copy of clinical hours, supervisors' information, placeholders as appropriate
Oral Presentation of Case Study

Poor

Information presented lacked accuracy; no citations provided
Fair

Some of the information presented had inaccuracies; cited as appropriate
Good

Presented answer in a confident manner; all information was accurate; cited as appropriate
Oral Presentation of 2 artifacts

Poor

Most information presented lacked accuracy; no citations provided
Fair

Some of the information presented had inaccuracies; cited as appropriate
Good

Presented answer in a confident manner; all information was accurate; cited as appropriate
Code of Ethics

Poor

Demonstrated no understanding of the Code of Ethicswhen verbally defending a position of a ethical question.
Fair

Demonstrated basic knowledge of the Code of Ethics when verbally defending a position of a ethical question.
Good

Demonstrated understanding of the Code of Ethics when verbally defending a position of a ethical question.
Culminating Reflection

Poor

Does not demonstrate growth
Fair

Demonstrated some growth of knowledge and professionalism when sharing future goals and aspirations as a SLP
Good

Demonstrated growth of knowledge and professionalism through sharing future goals and aspirations as a SLP
Microstructure of reflections

Poor

More than 5 spelling, grammar, capitalization, or punctuation errors; no citations used
Fair

Less than 5 spelling, grammar, capitalization, or punctuation errors; citation errors.
Good

No spelling, grammar, capitalization, or punctuation errors; cites using APA style as appropriate.
Professionalism

Poor

Does not present themselves in a professional manner. Does not use professional vocabulary or expressions during presentation; uses only colloquial jargon
Fair

Presents themselves in a professional manner but does not consistently use professional vocabulary or expressions during presentation; uses more colloquial jargon
Good

Present themselves in a professional manner as if they were working in the field. Uses professional vocabulary and expressions during presentation instead of colloquial jargon




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16