- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WRT 120: Literacy Autobiography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WRT 120: Literacy Autobiography WRT 120: Literacy Autobiography A personal reflection connected to the individual development of the writer. Rubric Code: G24249W By edebra Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Text Feature
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Poor 10 pts
A strong voice	Excellent Experiences are reflected on for their place in literacy development. The focus is analysis, not narration.	Good Experiences are narrated and occasionally reflected on. The focus switches back and forth from analysis to mere narration.	Poor The paper has a weak narrative emphasis. The writer tells a story and only minimally reflects on literacy development.
Perspective	Excellent The paper includes thoughts on reading and writing to learn, from the writer’s perspective as a student.	Good The paper may not have thoughts on reading AND writing to learn.	Poor Thoughts on reading and writing to learn may not be present.
Focus	Excellent Clear description and careful choice of selected reading and writing memories, good or bad, and becoming literate.	Good It is not obvious why these particular experiences were chosen or how the writer became literate.	Poor A history of becoming literate may be missing or vague.
Process	Excellent Writer ACTIVELY participated in the Peer Review Process.	Good Writer BARELY/partially participated in Peer Review Process.	Poor Writer did not participate in the Peer Review Process.
Conventions	Excellent Writing has few or no errors in usage, spelling and punctuation. Sentence structure is varied. Overall, the writing reflects undergraduate student expectations.	Good Writing has errors in usage, spelling, and/or punctuation. Sentences may be complete but may not flow in readability. The writing is competent but not clearly undergraduate.	Poor Usage, spelling, and/or punctuation show serious problems and lack of proofreading. Sentences are simple and unvaried. Writing is not at an undergraduate level.