Skip to main content
iRubric: Feedback Mechanisms Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Feedback Mechanisms Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Feedback Mechanisms Presentation Rubric 
Class Presentation Rubric
This rubric is designed to assess a class presentation with a visual component.
Rubric Code: FX69CA4
By lrothen
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Class Presentation Rubric
  Beginning

1 pts

Developing

2 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Distinguished

4 pts

Information

Beginning

This presentation touches only on the very barest of detail. While generally about the topic, there is little to no specificity. There is a significant lack of evidence to support claims and/or there are major problems with inaccuracies. Significant omissions have been made.
Developing

This presentation hits the major points, but lacks detail. Information is too generalized to draw accurate conclusions. There is little evidence to support claims, and there are problems with accuracy. There are glaring omissions of information.
Proficient

While a generally good presentation, the information is less specific and less focused. There is some evidence to support claims, but support is less consistent than a 4. The information lacks some accuracy or specificity. Only small omissions of information are evident.
Distinguished

The presentation is focused and on-topic. Specific evidence is cited to support claims. Information is accurate, informative, and specific. All required pieces of information are included.
Quality of presentation

Beginning

It is apparent that there was little or no preparation. Presenters read from a screen or notes and are unable to discuss the topic. There is no evidence of collaboration. Presenters are unable to answer questions.
Developing

The presentation is too short and/or too confusing. Presenters offers little evidence to support claims, and there is little evidence to show true collaboration. Presenters read their presentation from the screen or from notes. One or more presenters has almost no role in presentation. Presenters are unable to answer several questions with any authority or accuracy.
Proficient

Presenters lack some evidence for claims, and there is less evidence of true collaboration and understanding. Presenters are less confident in presentation; some presenters do not have equal roles. Some questions go unanswered.
Distinguished

There is evidence of collaboration and of thorough understanding of topic. Presenters are knowledgable and confident in presentation. All presenters have a role in presentation. Presenters are able to answer questions.
Visual component

Beginning

Visual component is pieced together from other sources. There is no evidence of effort on the part of the presenters to create an interesting, accurate visual component. There are multiple errors in writing conventions.
Developing

Visual component is amateurish and vague. The component is not interesting and lacks large sections of information. The conventions of good writing are not observed, with major errors in grammar and mechanics evident.
Proficient

Visual component is less interesting, less accurate, or may have technical difficulties. While generally good, the visual component lacks some information. The conventions of good writing (grammar, mechanics, etc.) are observed, with only a few minor errors.
Distinguished

Visual component is interesting, accurate, and functional. Technical issues have been worked out before presentation. Visual component contains all relevant information. The conventions of good writing are observed with only minor errors.
Content

Beginning

Feedback loop, stimulus, signal, response are clear and detailed. Vocabulary is not explained for the audience. Little or no correct academic vocabulary used.
Developing

Feedback loop, or stimulus, and response are present. Some vocabulary is explained for the audience. Some correct academic vocabulary used.
Proficient

Feedback loop, stimulus, and response are clear. Vocabulary is explained for the audience. Mostly correct academic vocabulary used.
Distinguished

Feedback loop, stimulus, signal, response are clear and detailed. Vocabulary is explained for the audience. Correct academic vocabulary used.



Keywords:
  • presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98