- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Solar Oven rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Solar Oven Solar Oven Studentss will use various materials to make a solar oven. Rubric Code: FX63W44 By buchris9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Solar Oven
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Hypothesis	Poor Group did not present question clearly. Group did not come up with a testable hypothesis. Groups did not record materials needed for experiment	Fair Group presented some question clearly. Group came up with a hypothesis Groups recorded some materials needed for experiment	Good Group presented question clearly. Group came up with a testable hypothesis Groups recorded materials needed for experiment
Procedure	Poor Groups did not record steps required to build their solar oven Groups did not draw picture(s) of setup used Groups constructed a plan through research to make a solar oven	Fair Groups recorded some steps required to build their solar oven Groups drew some picture(s) of setup used Groups constructed a plan through research to make a solar oven	Good Groups recorded all steps required to build their solar oven Groups drew picture(s) of setup used Groups constructed a plan through research to make a solar oven.
Observation	Poor Groups did not presented written descriptive observations Groups did not recorded measurements (time and temperature) every 5 minutes Groups created a table of observations/temperature/time Groups created a graph of temperature/time	Fair Groups presented some written descriptive observations Groups recorded some measurements (time and temperature) every 5 minutes Groups created a table of observations/temperature/time Groups created a graph of temperature/time	Good Groups presented written descriptive observations Groups recorded measurements (time and temperature) every 5 minutes Groups created a table of observations /temperature/time Groups created a graph of temperature/time
Conclusion	Poor Groups came up with no conclusion based on their results Groups recorded no “human errors” that could have altered results Groups described no ways they could have improved their design	Fair Groups came up with part of a conclusion based on their results Groups recorded some “human errors” that could have altered results Groups described ways they could have improved their design	Good Groups came up with a conclusion based on their results Groups recorded any “human errors” that could have altered results Groups described ways they could have improved their design