Skip to main content
iRubric: Rogerian Arguement Final Paper rubric

iRubric: Rogerian Arguement Final Paper rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rogerian Arguement Final Paper 
Rubric Code: F2428C6
By Lauracaler
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Introduction
  Poorly Done

(N/A)

Rushed or Incomplete

(N/A)

It's good but could be better

(N/A)

Well Done!

(N/A)

Points Possible: 30

Poorly Done

Missing/Incomplete: Did not follow any elements of the RA Introduction Format. No clear purpose, or the purpose is not fully explained. No thesis statement.
Rushed or Incomplete

Important components to the RA Introduction Format are missing, thus making the RA incomplete. The purpose is unclear or confusing.
No thesis statement, or confusing thesis statement.
It's good but could be better

Looking good. The RA Introduction Format is relatively solid. The introduction might be too basic. Purpose may be a little confusing, or not well-clarified. Not quite a four, but still comparatively good. Thesis statement is not as strong as it could be.
Well Done!

The RA Introduction format is solid. Concise, clear, and the purpose is evident. The reader has a clear understanding of what the rest of the Rogerian Argument Paper will cover.
Explanation of Both Sides
  Poorly Done

(N/A)

Rushed or Incomplete

(N/A)

It's good but could be better

(N/A)

Well Done!

(N/A)

Points Possible: 50

Poorly Done

Missing/ Incomplete/Biased. Did not present an unbiased stance on both sides of the issue. Does not connect to the thesis statement. Not textual evidence.
Rushed or Incomplete

Missing many components of one or both sides of the issue. Has some bias. Little textual evidence, analysis, or no or properly cited sources. Does not demonstrate the skills taught in ELA and History.
It's good but could be better

Good job of citing evidence, and creating a solid explanation. The explanation might hint at a bias towards one side. Adequate textual evidence, analysis, and correct use of sources and citations. Demonstrates competency in the skills taught in ELA and History.
Well Done!

Account of both sides is completely free of bias. Strong evidence, analysis, and use of sources and citations. Demonstrates full compentency in the skills taught in ELA and History.
Common Ground
  Poorly Done

(N/A)

Rushed or Incomplete

(N/A)

It's good but could be better

(N/A)

Well Done!

(N/A)

Points Possible: 30

Poorly Done

Missing/incomplete common ground. Did not present anything that shows what both sides have in common, or was clearly biased or misunderstood. No evidence, analysis, sources, or citations - or done correctly or poorly.
Rushed or Incomplete

Missing many components of the common ground portion of the argument. Has bias. Little textual evidence, analysis, sources, or citations. Does not demonstrate the skills taught in ELA and History.
It's good but could be better

Good work showing some common ground and use of evidence, sources, and citations. Some subtle bias was detected. Demonstrates competency in the skills taught in ELA and History.
Well Done!

Common ground is accurate, strong, and completely free of bias. Strong evidence, analysis, and use of sources and citations. Demonstrates full competency in the skills taught in ELA and History.
Conclusion
  Poorly Done

(N/A)

Rushed or Incomplete

(N/A)

It's good but could be better

(N/A)

Well Done!

(N/A)

Points Possible: 30

Poorly Done

Missing/Incomplete: Did not follow any elements of the RA conclusion Format.
Main ideas are missing, no reworking of the thesis, unorganized, and the final thought is inappropriate or missing.
Rushed or Incomplete

Important components to the RA Conclusion Format are missing, thus making the RA incomplete. Main Ideas are inadequate, confusing, or inconsistent. Inadequate or missing final thought.
It's good but could be better

Looking good. The RA Conclusion Format is relatively solid. The Conclusion might be too basic. Some main points are covered, or all are covered, just not adequately. Adequate final thought.
Well Done!

The RA Conclusion format is solid. Concise, clear, and the purpose is evident. The writer has reviewed the main points, reworked the thesis, and has given a strong final thought.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98