Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Leading a Class Discussion rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Leading a Class Discussion
Leading a Class Discussion
Rubric Code:
EXX82C7
By
HeatherR
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Leading a Class Discussion
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Preparation for Discussion
Individual Score
Poor
Unprepared. Misunderstood key elements of the text/issue at hand.
Fair
Somewhat prepared. Showed a partial understanding of the text/issue at hand.
Good
Well-prepared. Showed a good understanding of the issue/text at hand.
Excellent
Clearly well-prepared. Showed an excellent understanding of the issue/text at hand.
Organization
Group Score
Poor
Disorganized. Questions did not build on each other, nor was there a logical progression that could be perceived.
Fair
Somewhat organized. Led class to a basic understanding of the text/issue, though the progression was not always clear.
Good
Well-organized. Questions and presentation led class to a good understanding of the text/issue, but some portions of the discussion might have been better placed.
Excellent
Very well-organized. Discussion questions and presentation built on each other to lead class progressively to an in-depth understanding of the text/issue.
Questions
Group Score
Poor
Discussion questions were poorly formulated, did not elicit discussion and only dealt with the text/issue tangentially or in very vague terms. Comprehension questions may not have ensured full understanding.
Fair
Discussion questions elicited some responses and led class to a basic understanding of the text/issue, but did not delve into the more profound aspects. Comprehension question may not have ensured full understanding.
Good
Good discussion questions that elicited discussion and led class to a good general understanding of the text/issue. Comprehension questions ensured understanding of the text/video.
Excellent
Excellent and creative discussion questions that elicited much discussion and led students to an in-depth understanding of the text/issue. Comprehension questions ensured understanding of the article/video.
Discussion Techniques
Individual Score
Poor
Leader does very little to promote discussion. Either participants are completely unengaged or have taken over the discussion. There was not summary of discussion or the summary was insufficient.
Fair
Leader engages students slightly, or doesn't really lead. Other group members may dominate the discussion. Leader may not promote the discussion of others or does not take a leadership role. Summary of discussion was lacking.
Good
Leader engages students and encourages all students to contribute to discussion but may slightly dominate the discussion or may not promote the discussion of different points of view. Summary of discussion was performed well.
Excellent
Leader engages students;motivating.
Encourages all students to contribute to discussion.
Guides but does not dominate discussion.
Promotes the discussion of different viewpoints and is sensitive to not making group members feel uncomfortable. Summary of discussion was performed well and brought the discussion to a comfortable close.
Presentation
Group Score
Poor
Presentation did not lead to a great understanding of the issue. Pros and Cons spoken of superficially and no greater understanding of the issue emerged.
Fair
Presentation was fair. It may have been lacking in the full depth of the topic. The pros and cons may have been superficially mentioned but why or the number of pros and cons of the issue may have been lacking.
Good
Good presentation of the topic. Presentation was engaging. Class was able to grasp an understanding of the issue, the pros and cons and the relevance of the topic today. Concluding statement gave some insight/prediction surrounding the topic that was applicable.
Excellent
Excellent presentation of the topic. Presentation was engaging and stimulating. Class was able to grasp the full scope of the issue, a greater understanding of the pros and cons and the relevance of the topic today. Concluding statement (after discussion) gave insight/prediction surrounding the topic that was applicable.
Presentation Skills
Individual Score
Poor
Presenter stares
at slides or at
note cards
throughout presentation not
making an effort
to make eye
contact. Presenter
talks too quietly
for audience to
understand.
Presentation
slides are only
words, no visuals. Did not speak for full time.
Fair
Presenter did not
prepare adequately for
the presentation.
Presenter relies too much on notes or the
slides. Presenter makes
slight effort to make
eye contact with the
audience.
Good
Presenter maintains
adequate eye contact
throughout the
presentation but is not well rehearsed
even
though the presentation
content is good.
Possibly too many
wordy slides.
Excellent
Presenter maintains eye
contact throughout the
presentation. The
presenter is confident and well rehearsed
either they
memorized their section or only
had note cards.
Presenter's slides add
to the content, do not
distract from what
he/she is saying. Presenter spoke for the full time.
Team Preparation
Group Score
Poor
Team was not prepared. Either material was not emailed to students two days prior to the discussion or students were not ready to begin in class. (Time was wasted waiting for them to set up which took a lot of class time)
Fair
Team was prepared for all aspects of the assignment. Material was emailed to classmates and professor two days before the discussion but not by the deadline and or team was not ready to begin presentation on time.
Good
N/A
Excellent
Team was well prepared for all aspects of the assignment. Material (article/video, vocabulary, comprehension questions, discussion questions)was emailed to classmates and professor two days before the discussion (by noon) and team was ready to begin presentation on time.
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.