Skip to main content
iRubric: Presentation-communication Rubric

iRubric: Presentation-communication Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Presentation-communication Rubric 
Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: EXW5W7A
By melissaligh
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization

Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.
Good

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Excellent

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Subject Knowledge

Poor

Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Good

Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.
Excellent

Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Graphics/technology

Poor

Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics/technology
Fair

Student occasionally uses graphics/technology that rarely support text and presentation.
Good

Student's graphics/technology relate to text and presentation.
Excellent

Student's graphics/technology explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.
Mechanics

Poor

Student's presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors.
Fair

Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Good

Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Excellent

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Eye Contact

Poor

Student reads all of report with no eye contact.
Fair

Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report.
Good

Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes.
Excellent

Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes.
Elocution

Poor

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
Fair

Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Good

Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Excellent

Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Case study

Poor

Case study did not meet the requirements
Fair

Case study attempts to includes a relevant communication conflict and a resolution with an explanation but lacked thorough examination
Good

Case study includes a relevant communication conflict and a resolution with an explanation
Excellent

Case study includes a relevant communication conflict and a resolution with a thorough explanation
Life long learning

Poor

Presentation did not meet the requirements
Fair

Presentation lacked demonstration of life long learning
Good

Presentation demonstrated some learning with additional focus needed on specific areas
Excellent

Presentation demonstrates life long learning relevant to communication and conflict
Essay

Poor

Did not meet the requirements
Fair

Essay some discovery of strength but lacked thoroughness and included errors.
Good

Essay included a detailed explanation of strengths but opportunities in editing were apparent.
Excellent

Student included a detailed and well written essay highlighting the strengths of the other individual.
Reflection

Poor

Did not meet requirements
Fair

Reflection either lacked introspective thought or well written response.
Good

Reflection showed moderate introspective insight with moderate errors.
Excellent

Reflection was detailed and demonstrated introspective insight, well written, and professional.



Keywords:
  • Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16