Skip to main content
iRubric: Prototyping rubric

iRubric: Prototyping rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Prototyping 
Prototyping
This is the rubric for grading the Prototyping section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by JM, v2.0, revised 03/12 by DP, v3.0, revised 08/12 by the department)
Rubric Code: EX939AB
By tebbiechale
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Prototyping
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Documentation

Drawings
Schematics
Flowcharts
Code Listings
Exemplary/Excellent

Drawings and specifications are accurate, organized, complete and furnished in electronic format.

All code is properly commented and flowcharted.
Accomplished/Good

Documentation is accurate and complete but not properly organized. For example does not use standard symbols or orthographic views do not adhere to standard conventions.
Developing/Fair

Documentation is incomplete or inaccurate. For example dimensions are missing or are overspecified.
Deficient/Poor

Documentation is incomplete, inaccurate and not properly organized.
Fit & Function Review

Exemplary/Excellent

Computer simulation tools, physical models, component mock-ups have been used to validate component fit or function prior to prototype implementation.
Accomplished/Good

Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair

Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor

Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Material / Component Selection

Exemplary/Excellent

Material or component options were thoroughly researched and compared for best fit to design requirements.
Accomplished/Good

Deficiencies in Material/Component selection did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair

Deficiencies in Material/Component selection resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor

Deficiencies in Material/Component selection necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Fabrication process plan

Exemplary/Excellent

Fabrication process plan was sufficient to allow prototype to be fabricated as planned.

Process plan formulated and reviewed with advisor or technician prior to starting fabrication.
Accomplished/Good

Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair

Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor

Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Product Quality Workmanship

Exemplary/Excellent

Finished prototype is well constructed, accurately fabricated to specifications, fully functional and suitable for design verification.
Accomplished/Good

Finished prototype has implementation/fabrication deficiencies but is of sufficient quality to verify design.
Developing/Fair

Finished prototype has implementation/fabrication deficiencies that degrade the ability to verify the design.
Deficient/Poor

Finished prototype is so poorly constructed that it is not suitable for design verification.



Keywords:
  • IPC, Integrated Project Projects, prototyping

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16