- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: The Dialogue Poem rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
The Dialogue Poem The Dialogue Poem The Dialogue Poem Rubric Rubric Code: EX62XA3 By shough Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8

Esperanza Rising Dialogue Poem Represent two perspectives of the labor conflict in 1930s CA
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Needs improvement 5 pts
Evidence for Two Voices Use evidence and details from novel and supplemental resources to establish two perspectives	Excellent Two perspectives are striking and easy to identify. The contrast of experience is vivid through use of evidence and details from the novel and supplemental materials.	Good The two perspectives are clear. The contrast of experience is evident through use of evidence and some detail from the novel and supplemental materials.	Fair The two perspectives are somewhat clear. The contrast of experience may be unevenly represented through some evidence and detail from the novel and/or supplemental materials.	Needs improvement The two perspectives are unclearly represented. Contrast of experience may not be evident due t lack of evidence and detail from the novel or supplemental materials.
Figurative Language Use figurative language to create persepctive and contrast	Excellent Ample figurative language is used to create two distinct perspectives and highlight contrast between two perspectives.	Good Sufficient figurative language is used to establish contrast between two perspectives.	Fair Some figurative language is used. Some may contribute to creating differences between two perspectives.	Needs improvement There may be some figurative language, but it may not necessarily contribute to establishing two perspectives and contrast.
Explanation Explanation justifies poetic choices	Excellent Clear and thorough explanation of how the writer used evidence and figurative language to create two distinct perspectives and highlight contrasts in their lives.	Good Sufficient explanation of how the writer used evidence and figurative language to create perspectives and contrast.	Fair Explanation of how the writer used evidence and figurative language to create different perspectives is unevenly developed. May show evidence of struggling with thought process.	Needs improvement Explanation of how the writer used evidence and figurative language to create two perspectives is unclear and may be incomplete.