Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial rubric

iRubric: Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial Rubric Code: EX62657 By dianesanchez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: (none)

Social Critique/Persuasive Editoria 100 %
	Exceeds Standard 100 pts	At Standard 92 pts	Progress Toward Standard 84 pts	Does Not Meet Standard 76 pts
Thesis, Purpose, and Significance 20 %	Exceeds Standard Thesis is not only argumentative, but is also "surprising" or "risky," responds to assignment clearly and reflects author's purpose.	At Standard Thesis is argumentative, responds to assignment clearly and reflects author's purpose Essay's purpose is clear, but could use a bit more originality and independent thought.	Progress Toward Standard Thesis is argumentative, but could respond to assignment and reflect author's purpose more clearly Essay's purpose is somewhat clear, but lacks orginality and independent thought Author gives reader some sense of the significance of the problem addressed	Does Not Meet Standard Thesis not argumentative and does not respond to assignment or reflect author's purpose clearly Essay's purpose is unclear Significance of the problem addressed not given clearly
Argumentation/Rhetorical Strategies 20 %	Exceeds Standard Claims and ideas are developed logically and thoroughly, and are supported through relevant evidence and sound, thorough reasoning Clear and effective use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos Author acknowledges multiple viewpoints and anticipates objections effectively	At Standard claims and ideas are developed logically, and are supported with evidence and sound reasoning Use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos - evident Author anticipates some objections to his/her own position effectively	Progress Toward Standard Claims and ideas are developed somewhat logically with some support/evidence/reasoning Use of key rhetorical strategies -logos, ethos, and pathos - evident, but somewhat unclear Author anticipates some objections, but somewhat unclearly and ineffectively	Does Not Meet Standard Claims and ideas are underdeveloped and unsupported Very little use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos Author does not anticipate objections or ackknowledge other viewpoints
Source Analysis and Usage 20 %	Exceeds Standard Author accurately and thoroughly summarizes or parahrases sources used Author demonstrates ability to interpret sources accurately and analytically Sources are synthesized with one another and with ideas of author thoroughly and effectively	At Standard Author accurately summarizes or paraphrases sources used Author's interpretation of sources is accurate and somewhat analytical Sources are synthesized with one another and with ideas of the author to some extent	Progress Toward Standard Author summarizes or paraphrases some, but not all, sources used Author's interpretation of sources is fairly accurate, but could be more analytical Sources are somewhat synthesized with one another and with the ideas of the author	Does Not Meet Standard Author's summaries of sources are inadequate or inaccurate Author's interpretation of sources is inaccurate and not analytical Sources are not synthesized with one another and with the author's ideas
Style and Voice 15 %	Exceeds Standard Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience, purpose, genre, and claims, but also showoriginality and creativity Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied throughout essay Sentences are clear, active, and to the point	At Standard Style and voice approrpiate to the given audience, prupose, genre, and claims Word choice is specific and purposefulo, and somewhat varied throughout essay Sentences are mostly clear, active, and to the point	Progress Toward Standard Style and voice are, at times, appropriate to given audience, purpose, genre, and claims Word choice is often unspecific, genreic, redundant, and cliche Sentences are somewhat unclear; excessive use of passive voice	Does Not Meet Standard Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, cliche, and unspecific
Presentation & Organization 25 %	Exceeds Standard Topic sentences identify paragraphs' purposes, refelct their content and contribute to overall unity of essay Transitions indicate relationships between not only paragraphs, but also ideas Overall organization of paragraphs is logical and purposeful The essay is free from grammatical and mechanical errors.	At Standard Topic sentences reflect most paragraph content but may not contribute to overall unity of essay Transitions indicate relationships between paragraphs Overall organization of paragraphs is mostly logical and purposeful Grammatical or mechanical errors exist, but not enough to distract from reading	Progress Toward Standard Topic sentences do not consistently reflect paragraph content Transitions sometimes do not indicate relationships between paragraphs Organization of paragraphs is sometimes logical, but sometimes illogical and somewhat distracting Grammatical or mechanical errors distract somewhat from reading	Does Not Meet Standard Topic sentences unclear or non-existent Transitions fail to indicate relationships between paragraphs Organization of paragraphs illogical and distracting Essay has excessive grammatical and mechanical erros that hinder readability substantially

Subjects:

English

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16