Skip to main content
iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Final Exam rubric

iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Final Exam rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Spanish Lit Final Exam 
AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis
AP Spanish Literature Final Exam Rubric
Rubric Code: EX4959B
By SraTiller
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Single Text Analysis
  Demonstrates Superiority

5 pts

Demonstrates Competence

4 pts

Suggests Competence

3 pts

Suggests Lack of Competence

2 pts

Demonstrates Lack of Competence

1 pts

Literary Features

Demonstrates Superiority

Thoroughly analyzes a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features.
Demonstrates Competence

Explains rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Competence

Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but may not explain their relevance. Suggests a lack of understanding of the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but does not explain their relevance. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the text.
Contextual Knowledge

Demonstrates Superiority

Demonstrates superior understanding of multiple literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical contexts.
Demonstrates Competence

Explains one literary, historical, sociocultural and/or geopolitical context(s).
Suggests Competence

Identifies features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s) but may not be relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Identifies some features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s) may not be relevant or completely accurate.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Identifies some features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s) but does not explain the relevance to the text. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the context(s) or the text.
Cultural Analysis

Demonstrates Superiority

Analyzes how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the texts reflect the given context.
Demonstrates Competence

Explains how the cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the texts reflect the given context.
Suggests Competence

Identifies cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text but may not explain how culture is reflectedin the given context.
Suggests Lack of Competence

May not address cultural features found in the text or explanation of cultural products, practices, or perspectives may be unclear.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Does not address cultural products, practices, or perspectives. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of cultural features in the text.
Examples

Demonstrates Superiority

Supports analysis by integrating 3-5 specific, well-chosen examples throughout the response.
Demonstrates Competence

Supports analysis by citing and discussing 1-2 appropriate examples.
Suggests Competence

Elaborates on main points and supports observations by citing examples; however, the examples may not always be clear and relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Presents main points and some details, describes basic elements of the text, but may do so without citing examples or supporting an argument.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without citing examples.
Organization

Demonstrates Superiority

Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical progression of ideas in a well-developed response.
Demonstrates Competence

Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence

Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), evidence of organization (a stated topic, an introduction, a conclusion), and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Balance and Focus

Demonstrates Superiority

Response has a clearly balanced focus that includes analysis of the texts, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre.
Demonstrates Competence

Response has a reasonably balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre.
Suggests Competence

Response attempts to have a balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre. If the response has a significantly unbalanced focus, the analysis must be good to achieve this score.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Response has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified movement/(sub-)genre, or the given context.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Demonstrates lack of understanding and has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified movement/(sub-)genre, or the given context.
Language Use- Vocabulary

Demonstrates Superiority

Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed,

presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some

nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presents

main ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be

limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and

forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being

discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar

Demonstrates Superiority

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use

of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and

formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional

elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional

errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from

understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in

the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract

from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally

accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in

verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious

enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors

in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and

impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions

Demonstrates Superiority

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,

paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping

and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,

paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract

from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression

of ideas.
Suggests Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,

paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not

detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping

of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,

paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and

serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may

not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,

paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede

comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence

of paragraphing.



Keywords:
  • spanish literature final exam


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98