- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Literature Circle rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Literature Circle rubric Literature Circle rubric Assesses students productivity and participation within literature circles. Rubric Code: ECC388 By Diybarra Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Reading Grade Levels: K-5

Literature Circles
	Good 5 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Discussion director	Good Wrote at least 4 interesting questions to discuss with the group. The questions were challenging and thought provoking.	Fair Wrote 3 questions to share with the group. The questions weren't challenging and had simple answers.	Poor Provided less that 3 questions. Questions had simple and/or yes/no answers.
Word wizard	Good Found 5 new, unique, or interesting words to discuss. I provided page numbers and clear, easy to understand definitions for each word.	Fair Found 3-4 new unique, or interesting words. I provided page numbers and defintions for each word.	Poor Found 2 or fewer new, unique or interesting words. Page numbers missing and/or unclear definitions.
Literary Luminary	Good Wrote at least 3 interesting passages from the reading to discuss with the group. The passages were challenging and thought provoking	Fair .Wrote 3 passages to share with the group. The passages weren't challenging and had simple answers.	Poor Provided less that 3 questions. passages had simple and/or yes/no answers.
Summarize	Good Wrote thorough summary of the section. Included only major ideas and events. Summary is in correct sequence and contains accurate information.	Fair Wrote summary of the section. Included some minor details along with major ideas and events. Information is accurate, but out of order.	Poor Summary missing major ideas and events from section. Focused on too many minor details. Information is inaccurate and/or out of order.
Discussion Participation	Good Was a positive contributor in discussions. Provided insightful comments and questions. Listened to others and didn't dominate the discussion.	Fair Contributed to group discussions. Comments and questions weren't always thought out. Either dominated the discussion or needed to participate more at times.	Poor Poor contributor to discussions. Comments were off task and distracting to grouop.