Skip to main content
iRubric: Firm Valuation Project rubric

iRubric: Firm Valuation Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Firm Valuation Project 
Grading rubric for the group project in FIN 417.
Rubric Code: DXXB87C
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Finance  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Incomplete

15 pts

Poor

24 pts

Unsatisfactory

28 pts

Fair

32 pts

Very Good

36 pts

Excellent

40 pts

Quality of Writing

Enter criteria description

Incomplete

The quality of the writing prohits the contents and the ideas contained within the be incomprehensible to the reader.
Poor

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are often violated; spelling is incorrect. Language is often unclear and imprecise; sentences do not always display consistently strong, varied structure. The paper appears unprofessional and disorganized.
Unsatisfactory

With a few exceptions, rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is sometimes unclear and imprecise; sentences do not always display consistently strong, varied structure. The paper appears unprofessional and disorganized.
Fair

With a few exceptions, rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is sometimes unclear and imprecise; sentences do not always display consistently strong, varied structure. The paper is organized in a professional manner.
Very Good

With a few exceptions, rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. The paper is organized in a professional manner.
Excellent

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. The paper is organized in a professional manner.
Quality of Presentation

Enter criteria description

Incomplete
Poor
Unsatisfactory
Fair
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of Analysis

Enter criteria description

Incomplete

Major parts of the analysis are missing or incomplete.
Poor

The analysis and/or recommendation are not adequate and do not show an understanding of the concepts.
Unsatisfactory

The analysis and recommendations show a superficial but not in-depth understanding of the concepts and material. The recommendation does not match the analysis.
Fair

The analysis and recommendations show a superficial but not in-depth understanding of the concepts and material. However, the recommendation matches the analysis.
Very Good

The analysis provides an adequate but not thorough understanding of the concepts and material. The recommendations for the firm are adequate and match the data.
Excellent

The analysis provides a thorough understanding of the concepts and material. The recommendations for the firm are logical and based on the data.
Enter Title
  Enter Title

(N/A)

Enter Title

18 pts

Enter Title

21 pts

Enter Title

24 pts

Enter Title

27 pts

Enter Title

30 pts

Project Requirements

Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16