Skip to main content
iRubric: Digital Portfolio - Final Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Digital Portfolio - Final Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Digital Portfolio - Final Presentation Rubric 
Please use this rubric to record your reflection on the work done by the student both in person through the presentation and digitally through the work submitted into their digital portfolio.
Rubric Code: DXW22X6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Digital Portfolio Presentation
  Good

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Student Intro of Competencies

Good

Student is able to state the seven competencies with confidence and justify in detail the reason for their purpose at Maynard High School.
Fair

Student is able to state the seven competencies but isn't able to elaborate on them much and struggles with seeing their purpose at Maynard High School.
Poor

Student is unable to name the seven competencies and does not know their purpose at Maynard High School.
Portfolio Organization

Good

Portfolio is easy to navigate. Files are named appropriately and consistently. There was never any confusion generated from the layout and organization of the portfolio.
Fair

Portfolio was fairly easy to navigate. Most files were named appropriately and consistently. There were a few issues that caused confusion, but nothing significant.
Poor

Lack of organization took away from the overall presentation of the portfolio. File names were distracting and had errors.
Creativity and Innovation

Good

Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes
using technology. Students:
a. apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes.
b. create original works as a means of personal or group expression.
Fair

Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes
using technology -- but lack some of the two specific aspects in the "excellent" category.
Poor

Students lack all the aspects of the creativity and innovation specifics in the "excellent" category.
Communication and Collaboration

Good

Students use digital media to communicate and collaborate (if in a partnership) to support project. Students:
a. interact with peers and experts (could be your teachers, blogs, textbooks).
b. communicate effectively to multiple audiences.
c. develop cultural understanding and global awareness to produce original works or solve problems.
Fair

Students are lacking one of the three key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Poor

Students are lacking two or more of the three key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Information Fluency

Good

Students apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information. Students:
a. plan strategies to guide inquiry.
b. locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media.
c. evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks and your topic/material selected.
d. process data and report results.
Fair

Students are lacking one of the four key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Poor

Students are lacking two or more of the four key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Technology Operations and Concepts

Good

Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations. Students:
a. understand and use technology systems.
b. select and use applications effectively and productively.
c. troubleshoot systems and applications.
d. transfer current knowledge to learning of new technologies.
Fair

Students are lacking one of the four key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Poor

Students are lacking two or more of the four key aspects of the "good" category for this assessment.
Writing Mechanics

*School wide writing rubric attached*

Good

In any and all writing components, the student's writing skills are mostly advanced judging by the criteria on the school-wide writing rubric.
Fair

In any and all writing components, the student's writing skills are generally satisfactory judging by the criteria on the school-wide writing rubric.
Poor

In any and all writing components, the student's writing skills are only developing judging by the criteria on the school-wide writing rubric.
Professionalism

Good

Student presented themselves in a professional manner. Student was a pleasure to meet with and maintained a professional attitude throughout the entire discussion and presentation.
Fair

Student presented themselves in a professional manner but lacked being able to maintain a professional attitude throughout the entire presentation and discussion.
Poor

Student was not professional and lacked the skills necessary to hold a professional discussion.
Ability to Defend Claims

Good

Student was able to eloquently defend their claims made in their reflections and were able to answer all questions with detail and evidence.
Fair

Student was able to defend the claims made in their reflections but struggled to answer with detail and evidence.
Poor

Student was unable to defend the claims made in their reflections.
Effort

Good

It is clear the student put in the necessary time and effort to create a comprehensive portfolio they are proud of.
Fair

Some work seemed rushed and more thought could have been put into the reflections in order to convey their message more clearly.
Poor

There was little to no evidence of effort put into each component of the portfolio.



Keywords:
  • Computer Applications

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16