Skip to main content
iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study rubric

iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Assessment Criteria for Case Study 
Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302
Rubric Code: DX77C6B
By crozmish
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Component
50 %
  Exemplary

100-85%

(N/A)

Proficient

84-75%

(N/A)

Emerging

74-65%

(N/A)

Satisfactory

64-50%

(N/A)

Unsatisfactory

Below 50%

(N/A)

Introduction
15 %
Introduction
5 %

Introduces and succinctly clarifies the situation faced by the client.
Exemplary

Evidence of ability to interpret and understand the issues presented in the case study and summarise them succinctly and accurately.
Proficient

Evidence of ability to understand and analyse the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with some problems with clarity.
Emerging

Evidence of understanding the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with many problems with clarity.
Satisfactory

Reproduced the case study details only, and many problems with clarity.
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of ability to understand or succinctly define the case study.
Introduction
10 %

Provides an overview definition of the client's issues and the approach that should be taken.
Exemplary

A succinct and clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay is given, including the relevant theories and ideas to be discussed.
Proficient

A clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, with some problems with clarity and writing.
Emerging

An introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, but with many problems with clarity and writing.
Satisfactory

An introduction is offered, but with some errors in clarity of what the paper will be written on, and many problems with writing.
Unsatisfactory

No summary of overview and focus of essay offered.
Main Body
60 %
Main Body
20 %

Theories, concepts and ideas of approach chosen match effectively with client's issues.
Exemplary

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the client effectively, and communicate this succinctly.
Proficient

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the client, and communicate these effectively.
Emerging

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the client.
Satisfactory

Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the client, but with many problems accurately communicating them.
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of knowledge of appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the client.
Main Body
20 %

An insightful explanation of key links between issues faced by the client and the relevant intervention strategies are provided.
Exemplary

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate and relevant intervention strategies to address the issues of the client, and this is communicated succinctly.
Proficient

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate interventionstrategies to address the issues of the client are made, and this is communicated succinctly.
Emerging

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate intervention strategies to address the issues of the client are made, and this is not clearly communicated.
Satisfactory

Evidence of ability to reproduce intervention strategies to address the issues of the client are made, but with many problems linking the issues with strategies, and with communicating these links.
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of knowledge of relevant intervention strategies for the presenting issues of the client.
Main Body
20 %

Clinical supervision related to the case study is discussed and professional and personal learnings are made
Exemplary

Clear evidence of clinical supervision is provided.

Personal and professional
learnings are comprehensively discussed
Proficient

Some evidence of clinical supervision is provided.

Personal and professional learnings are adequately discussed
Emerging

Evidence of clinical supervision is provided.

2-3 personal and professional learnings are discussed
Satisfactory

Clinical Supervision is mentioned.

1 personal and 1 professional learning discussed
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of Clinical Supervision is given.
Conclusion
15 %
Conclusion
10 %

A succinct and precise summary of the relevant issues faced by the client and their relevance to key theoretical ideas have been made.
Exemplary

A succinct and precise summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.
Proficient

A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.
Emerging

A summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and key theories are given.
Satisfactory

A weak summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and theories are given.
Unsatisfactory

No summary of essay offered.
Conclusion
5 %

Effective recommendations for the client, with regard to possible solutions and/or future directions, are made.
Exemplary

A succinct and precise summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.
Proficient

A succinct summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.
Emerging

A summary of the appropriate recommendations and future directions or solutions are given.
Satisfactory

A weak summary of the recommendations are given, but may not include any solutions and/or future directions.
Unsatisfactory

No summary of recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions given.
Overall Quality of Paper
10 %
Overall Quality of Paper
5 %

Quality of writing style
Exemplary

Evidence of excellent essay structure, flow of argument, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Proficient

Evidence of good essay structure, flow of argument, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Emerging

Evidence of satisfactory essay structure, flow of argument, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Satisfactory

Evidence of some essay structure, flow of argument, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of essay structure, flow of argument, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Overall Quality of Paper
5 %

Use of APA formatting and referencing.
Exemplary

Accurate use of APA . formatting and in text referencing used throughout the essay.
Proficient

Good use of APA formatting and in text referencing used throughout the essay.
Emerging

Satisfactory use of APA formatting and in text referencing used throughout the essay.
Satisfactory

Evidence of some use of APA formatting and in text referencing used throughout the essay.
Unsatisfactory

No evidence of use of APA formatting. or in text referencing.



Keywords:
  • case study, counselling


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98