Skip to main content
iRubric: JULIUS CAESAR BLOG RUBRIC

iRubric: JULIUS CAESAR BLOG RUBRIC

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
JULIUS CAESAR BLOG RUBRIC 
This rubric will be used to assess the quality of your responses to Julius Caesar Blog Assignments as well as student responses.
Rubric Code: DX5286A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric JULIUS CAESAR BLOG
 

Needs Improvement

0 pts


Unsatisfactory

1 pts


Limited

2 pts


Profient

3.5 pts


GOOD

4 pts


EXCELLENT

5 pts

OVERALL BLOGS

0

Student did not attempt activity
1

Student Did Not Complete FOUR Postings
2

Student Did Not Complete FIVE or Postings meet minimum requirement and are poorly written.
3.5

Postings display an understanding of the required topic -- Student makes some effort at connecting to topic
4

Postings display a solid understanding of the topics and student made a sincere effort to convey their point. Topics related to text are thoughtful and well-chosen.
5

Postings display an excellent understanding of content. Blogs are interesting/well-written/well chosen and show thorough understanding of the play
FORMAT

0

Student did not attempt activity
1

STUDENT DID NOT COMPLETE FOUR POSTINGS
2

STUDENT DID NOT COMPLETE FIVE POSTINGS
3.5

Blogs, while completed are not labelled properly in part [No Topic/No Specific Task/Does Not Follow Model]
4

All blogs labelled correctly and complete
5

Student cut/pastes properly formatted blogs into word document and submits.
REPLIES TO OTHERS

0

Student did not attempt activity
1

Written interactions show disrespect for the viewpoints of others.
2

Written interactions show only superficial response [good job...i agree...] Shows minimal effort
3.5

Written interactions show some insight into the play or task at hand [minority of the responses are well-written/thoughtful]
4

Written interactions show some insight into the play or task at hand [majority of the responses are well-written/thoughtful]
5

Written interactions show insight into the play or task at hand. [ej.. Discuss other parts of the play that may contradict or support your claim -- offer honest debate on topic]
INDIVIDUAL TOPICS [Done 5 Times]

0

Student did not attempt activity
1

Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Displays minimal effort
2

Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader. No details from play/ experience brought into writing
3.5

Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Student stays on topic and offers sufficient details/analysis that makes the topic readable
4

Solid response that shows at attempt at insight and preparation. Written responses are mostly free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
5

Solid response that shows individual insight and preparation. Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.



Keywords:
  • PROJECT







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98