Skip to main content
iRubric: Deems' Genocide Research Paper 2 rubric

iRubric: Deems' Genocide Research Paper 2 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Deems' Genocide Research Paper 2 
Holocaust Research Paper
Submit 3-5 typed pages of publishing the results of your research. Include a Works Cited page with at 3-5 sources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on suffiency of research to support the thesis, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, and relevance of included information. Grade will be based on organization, clarity, use of transitions, appropriate voice, correct citation format, grammar, spelling and punctuation. Don't Forget: -at least 2 quotes per paragraph -indent paragraphs & when direct quotes are longer than 4 lines -introduce direct quotes -use a hanging indent for Works Cited page
Rubric Code: D8937X
By mbtmdeems
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Mini Research Paper
100 % Worth 100 points Total
  Not really...

(N/A)

Push it a bit more...

(N/A)

Almost there...

(N/A)

WooHoo!

(N/A)

Quality of research

Sources
Citations
Research
Not really...

--2 or fewer sources
--too few citations utilized
--Little information relevant to thesis.
--Insufficient information provided to support thesis.
--Minimal research.
Push it a bit more...

--Failed to cite at least 3 sources
--Many citation errors
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of thesis.
--Surface research.
Almost there...

--used 3-5 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of thesis.
--Research of sufficent depth.
WooHoo!

--used 3-5 sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Works Cited

Sources
Citations
Not really...

-- Sources not properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Many errors in format or punctuation.
--OR no bibliography.
Push it a bit more...

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Multiple errors in format or punctuation.
Almost there...

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Few errors in format or punctuation.
WooHoo!

--All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page.
-- Almost zero or no errors in format or punctuation.
Content

Thesis & Support
(Body Paragraphs)
Not really...

--Thesis unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for thesis insufficient
Intro does not intro topic
Push it a bit more...

--Thesis poorly stated.
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.
Intro Attempts to intro topic
Almost there...

--Thesis stated clearly.
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
Intro introduces topic but it too wordy or vague.
WooHoo!

--Thesis clear, interesting.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject.
Intro is concise and interesting.
Grammar and Mechanics

Style
Spelling & punctuation
Mechanics & grammar
Not really...

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--Many errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Many errors in punctuation or capitalization errors.
Push it a bit more...

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--Few spelling errors.
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
Almost there...

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
WooHoo!

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Organization

Not really...

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Push it a bit more...

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Almost there...

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
WooHoo!

--Clear, appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16