Skip to main content
iRubric: Case Presentation rubric

iRubric: Case Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Presentation 
Students are do a case conceptualization presentation
Rubric Code: D5ABAW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case Presentation
  Poor

0 pts

Adequate

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Content - Writing

Poor

Presentation is cut and pasted from a secondary source

Many typographical errors
Adequate

Some minor typographical or spelling errors but otherwise well researched, well written, well organized, and in your own voice
Excellent

All information is well researched, well written, well organized, and in your own voice
Conceptualization

Poor

Student's material does not supply necessary data regarding background, inferences about diagnosis
Adequate

Student supplied some data regarding background, inferences about diagnosis
Excellent

Student supplied excellent data regarding background, inferences about diagnosis
Theoretical Orientation

Poor

Student's explanation of theory displayed little understanding of main concepts
Adequate

Student's explanation of theory displayed adequate understanding of main concepts
Excellent

Student's explanation of theory displayed adequate understanding of main concepts
Application of Theory

Poor

Student did not apply the his/her theory to this case
Adequate

Student applied some of the main ideas of the theory to this case
Excellent

Student applied most of the main ideas of the theory to the case.
Interventions

Poor

Student failed to mention any interventions
Adequate

Student mentioned interventions but they did not flow from the stated theoretcial orientation
Excellent

Student mentioned interventions and they did flowed from the stated theoretcial orientation
Developmental Theory

Poor

Student failed to identify a specific developmental theory or did not establish the correct stage within the theory
Adequate

Student identified a theory and correctly established appropriate stage but did not go into detail about previous stages
Excellent

Student identified a theory and correctly established appropriate stage and demonstrated a thorough undersatnding of the previous stages
Multicultural Implications

Poor

Student failed to identify any multicultural considerations
Adequate

Student identified and discusssed at least one multicultural consideration
Excellent

Student identified and discussed in detail at least two multicultural considerations
Ethical Considerations

Poor

Student failed to identify ethical considerations or did not identify the specific guideline
Adequate

Student identified at least 2 ethical consideration that might be pertinent and identified the specific guidelines
Excellent

Student identified more than 2 ethical consideration that might be pertinent and correctly identified the specific guidelines
Organization if session

Poor

Student failed to discuss how the session was organized or conducted
Adequate

Student explained how the session was organized or conducted
Excellent

Student explained how the session was oragnized or conducted and went into detail
Personal Reactions

Poor

Student failed to discuss personal reactions to the student/client
Adequate

Student discussed personal reactions but without insight
Excellent

Student discussed personal reactions with insight
Strenghts Weaknesses

Poor

Student neglected to mention student/client strenghts and weaknesses
Adequate

Student mentioned at least one student/client strenght and weakness
Excellent

Student discussed student/client strenghts and weaknesses with good insight
Questions

Poor

Student neglected to mention any questions about the case
Adequate

Student mentioned at least one questions about the case
Excellent

Student discussed more than one question about the case
Self Rating

Poor

Student neglected to give a self-rating
Adequate

Student gave self rating withut explanation
Excellent

Student gave self-rating and explanation
Technical
  Poor

0 pts

Adequate

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Number of slides

Poor

less than 11 slides
Adequate

11-15 slides
Excellent

Presentation contains more than 15 slides
Graphics

Poor

Presentation does not contain any graphics and is all text
Adequate

Presentation has some graphics but seems cluttered
Excellent

Presentation has a professional look with an overall graphical theme that appeals to the audience, compliments the information, and is visually appealing
Sounds/clips

Poor

No links or sounds included
Adequate

Links are included but do not function
Excellent

Sounds are included and are fully functioning
Communication
  Poor

0 pts

Adequate

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Eye - Voice Contact

Poor

No eye contact with audience

Voice was difficult to hear/understand
Adequate

Some eye contact


Voice adequately modulated
Excellent

Maintained excellent eye contact and voice was very well modulated
Delivery

Poor

Read directly from screen with no additional information
Adequate

Mainly read from the screen but included some additional information
Excellent

Rarely read directly from screen and used other information to enhance understanding of the topic
Closure

Poor

Neglected to check for understanding via questions
Adequate

Did check for understanding but was not able to answer questions
Excellent

Did check for understanding and was able to answer questions
Handouts

Poor

No handout provided
Adequate

Handout provided with information about the topic
Excellent

Handout provided with excellent resources and information about the topic



Keywords:
  • counseling psychology school counselors

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16