- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Financial Statement Analysis Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Financial Statement Analysis Presentation Financial Statement Analysis Presentation Presentation to Board of Directors on firm's annual performance Rubric Code: D4AB52 By teacher Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Accounting Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Presentation Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Presentation	Poor Presentation very difficult to follow and unorganized, possibly even confusing. Audience had trouble understanding or following.	Fair Presentation includes most of the required information. Subject information jumps around and not presented clearly so audience can follow.	Good Presetation includes all basic information requested, in reasonably organized fashion Audience was able to follow and understand.	Excellent Presentation seemed very organized and clear. Presented in a logical manner. Students provided additional materials ie; power point, handouts, whiteboard use, information that was not requested, etc.
Subject Knowledge	Poor Students do not have grasp of information; students cannot answer questions about subject.	Fair Students are uncomfortable with information and are able to answer only redimentary questions.	Good Students are at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fail to elaborate.	Excellent Students demonstrate full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explainations and elaboration.
Eye Contact / Voice	Poor Students demonstrated minimal eye contact. Student voice was unauditable, mumbled, or otherwise not understood.	Fair Student occasionally showed good eye contact. Students voice was difficult to understand or hear, lots 'ums' or other fillers.	Good Student maintained eye contact most of te time. Voice was clear and understandable, minimal filler words used.	Excellent Student maintained great eye contact. Student was easily understood, no filler words, and varied voice tone and volumn.
Group Dynamic	Poor Entire group did not equally participate or did not seem to have understanding of subject matter.	Fair Few members contributed. Only a few seemed to have subject knowledge.	Good Most members seemed to contribute and had knowledge of subject.	Excellent All members equally contributed and seemed to have good grasp of subject matter.