Skip to main content
iRubric: Debate 2011 Final Exam rubric

iRubric: Debate 2011 Final Exam rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Debate 2011 Final Exam 
Persuasive Speech
This rubric is designed to score your ability to buiild an opening statement about the given topic. Your success will depend on your incorporation of ethos, pathos, and logos that you have learned as well as your ability to support your argument logically.
Rubric Code: D47CA7
By pilum40
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Opening Statement
  Excellent

17 pts

Good

16 pts

Fair

14 pts

Some Improvement

12 pts

A Lot of Improvement

10 pts

Unacceptable

0 pts

Introduction of Statement

Excellent

Does a good job of grabbing attention, relating to the audience, stating a clear thesis statement/previewing major points, and provides a smooth transition into the body of the speech.
Good

The introduction does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair

The introduction does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement

The introduction is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement

There is an introduction, but it is lacking all of the requirements needed for an effective introduction.
Unacceptable

Introduction was not present; speaker started with the body of his/her speech.
Body of Statement

Excellent

Provides clear, organized support of the thesis statement (evidence); transitional statements are used to allow the speaker to moves smoothly from one point to the next; speaker continues to keep audience attn. by using interesting language.
Good

The body does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair

The body does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement

The body is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement

The body is missing 4 of the 5 requirements for an effective body and an excellent rating.
Unacceptable

The body was not present and the speaker did not support an argument presented in the thesis statement.
Conclusion of statement

Excellent

Does an excellent job of restating the purpose, and summarizing the major points; it connects with the audience; the speaker calls the audience to take action; the speaker ends with a lasting closing statement that leaves the audience satisfied.
Good

The conclusion does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair

The conclusion does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement

The conclusion is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement

The conclusion is missing 4 of the 5 requirements for an excellent rating.
Unacceptable

The conclusion was not present; the speaker ended by stating something like, "that's it; that's the end."
Persuasive Structure/Technique

Excellent

Does an excellent job of covering the material/answering possible questions; uses a mature level of presentation skills; uses a logical argument; appeals to audience (needs); uses all appeals of reason
Good

The student does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Uses two of the three appeals to reason
Fair

The student does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Uses one of the the three appeals of reason
Some Improvement

The student is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Confuses the meanings of the appeals to reason
A Lot of Improvement

The student is missing 4 of the five requirements for an excellent rating. Doesn't include any of the appeals of reason
Unacceptable

The student was not persuasive and did not present a mature logical argument.
Effectiveness

Excellent

The student was enthusiastic and passionate about the charity and points he/she wanted the audience to understand
Good

The student does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair

The student does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement

The studentr is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement

The student is missing 4 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Unacceptable

The statement seemed as if the student was just writing anything that he/she could think of just to complete the assignment.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98