Skip to main content
iRubric: AP Research Project Presentation Rubric

iRubric: AP Research Project Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Research Project Presentation Rubric 
Research Project Presentation Rubric
High school students will present the results of two weeks of research on a chosen topic.
Rubric Code: CXA9423
By CaryHall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Researched Presentation Rubri
Remember, this is your FINAL EXAM. In total, this project is worth 15% of your grade for this course.
  Poor

(D-F)

1 pts

Fair

(C)

2 pts

Good

(B)

3 pts

Excellent

(A)

4 pts

Academic Argument, 1

Poor

Your claim does not seem to interest you. You do not appear knowledgable. You entered in the research of your research question with bias. Your organization of information is odd or confusing.
Fair

Your claim mildly interests you. You are mildly knowledgable. You entered in the research of your research question with some bias. Your organization of information leaves something to be desired.
Good

Your claim somewhat interests you. You are somewhat knowledgable. You entered in the research of your research question unbiased. You have organized your information somewhat logically.
Excellent

Your claim interests you
You are knowledgable. You entered in the research of your research question unbiased. You have organized your information logically.
Academic Argument, 2

Poor

You have not considered your audience. You have not considered style and tone. You have not considered design and visual. Presentation was less than 6 minutes.
Fair

You have barely considered your audience. You have barely considered style and tone. You have barely considered design and visual. Presentation may have been less than 6 minutes.
Good

You have somewhat considered your audience. You have somewhat considered style and tone. You have somewhat considered design and visual. Presentation was 6-8 minutes.
Excellent

You have considered your audience. You have considered style and tone. You have considered design and visual.
Presentation was 6-8 minutes.
Quality of Research

Poor

Does not include information from at least 3 trustworthy sources. All basic, introductory knowledge. It shows little to no attempt to do academic research.
Fair

Includes information from 3-4 trustworthy sources, and information is somewhat new and revelatory. It shows a basic attempt to do academic research.
Good

Includes information from at least 5 trustworthy sources, and information is somewhat new and revelatory. It shows a true attempt to do academic research.
Excellent

Includes information from at least 5 trustworthy sources, and information is interesting, new, and shows depth of academic research.
Annotated Bibliography

Poor

There are no annotations included with Works Cited slide, or the Works Cited slide does not exist.
Fair

There are minimal annotations included with Works Cited. Issues with MLA. What is included is missing how the source relates to your topic and the type of example the source provides.
Good

There is an attempt to properly annotate each citation in
MLA format, but the annotations are missing either how the source relates to your topic or the type of example the source provides.
Excellent

There is a fully successful attempt to properly annotate each citation in
MLA format. The annotations include both how the source relates to your topic and the type of example the source provides.
Presentation Skill

Poor

Pausing
Unrehearsed
Lack of, or poor, materials
Little eye contact
Very quiet voice
Fair

Some pausing
Little rehearsal
Fair materials
Some eye contact
Somewhat quiet voice
Good

Little pausing
Some rehearsal
Good materials
Good eye contact
Sufficient volume
Excellent

No pausing
Clearly practiced
Excellent materials
Excellent eye contact
Completely audible
Respect Given to Other Presenters

Poor

Talked and/or laughed often, used a phone or computer, or otherwise disrespected a fellow presenter.
Fair

Paid attention most of the time, but either became distracted and/or caused distraction at some points.
Good

Paid attention most of the time, but either became distracted and/or caused distraction at one point.
Excellent

Paid excellent attention, respected the other presenters, and showed appreciation.
Overall Quality/Effort

Poor

The assignment was not taken seriously at all and was not important to the student. The content and telling of the research were not interesting/ engaging. Student was not ready to present when called.
Fair

The assignment was not taken very seriously and was not very important to the student. The content and telling of the research were not very interesting/engaging. Quality of the presentation would have been better with more time.
Good

The assignment was taken somewhat seriously and was somewhat important to the student. The content and telling of the research were mildly interesting/engaging. Student clearly prepared
Excellent

Clearly shows that the assignment was taken seriously and was important to the student. The content of the research and the telling were quite interesting/ engaging. Student was well-prepared and ready when called.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16