Skip to main content
iRubric: Personal Response Essay (Slumdog Millionaire) rubric

iRubric: Personal Response Essay (Slumdog Millionaire) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Personal Response Essay (Slumdog Millionaire) 
Respond to 3 Question from the SlumdogMillionaire Film Study Sheet. Personal Response* structure: - Make links to Hinduism Unit - Makes links to Catholic Graduate Expectations - Personal thoughts and opinions are key - 3 - 7 slides, add images from movie, etc
Rubric Code: CX94A32
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Personal Response Essay
  R Poor

1 pts

1 Fair

2 pts

2 Good

3 pts

3 Advanced

4 pts

Exceeds

5 pts

Ideas (Content)

R Poor

These papers have minimal development, with little elaboration or explanation. Organization may be difficult to follow. They
may take the literary piece out of context to force an application. They contain the following:
Few or no concrete details
Strong imbalance between references to personal experience and references to the literature itself
Few or no quotations
1 Fair

These papers show some elaboration or explanation though organization may be inconsistent. They may stray slightly
from the context of the literary piece. They contain the following:
A few concrete details that SHOW what you have told.
Some imbalance between references to personal experience and references to the literature itself
Some quotations, but they may not be appropriate to your assertions or incorporated smoothly
2 Good

These papers show moderate development, with unified, coherent organization that keeps the context of the literary piece intact.
They contain the following:
Good concrete details that SHOW what you have told.
Good balance between references to personal experience and references to the literature itself
Several appropriate, quotations that support and anchor your assertions; may not be incorporated as smoothly as in an A
paper
3 Advanced

These papers are well developed, with unified, coherent organization that keeps the context of the literary piece intact. They
contain the following:
Extensive concrete details that SHOW what you have told.
Strong balance between references to personal experience and references to the literature itself
Many appropriate, smoothly incorporated quotations that support and anchor your assertions
Exceeds

These papers are exceedingly well developed, with unified, coherent organization that keeps the context of the literary piece intact. They
contain the following:
Extensive concrete details that SHOW what you have told.
Superb balance between references to personal experience and references to the literature itself
Appropriate, smoothly incorporated quotations that support and anchor your assertions
Organization (Structure)

R Poor

The organization is formulaic or inappropriate. The response may lack a clear introduction or conclusion. Transitions are rare.
1 Fair

The organization is generally appropriate and the ideas are clearly sequenced, but may be repetitive. Transitions are used
2 Good

The organization is appropriate and the sequencing of ideas is logical. Varied transitions are used.
3 Advanced

The organization of ideas supports the writer’s focus. Ideas are grouped in a logical manner. Effective and varied transitions are used.
Exceeds

The organization of ideas supports the writer’s focus. Ideas are grouped in a logical manner. Effective and varied transitions are used.
Style/Diction

R Poor

The language and tone are inappropriate. Word choice is incorrect or confusing. The response is incomplete or too brief.
1 Fair

The language and tone are uneven. Word choice is simple, ordinary, or repetitive. There is minimal variation in sentence length and structure.
2 Good

The language and tone are appropriate. Word choice is adequate, but may be simple or ordinary. Some sentence variety is evident.
3 Advanced

The writer utilizes carefully crafted phrases to create a sustained tone and an authoritative voice. Word choice reflects an advanced vocabulary.
Exceeds

The writer utilizes carefully crafted phrases to create a sustained tone and an authoritative voice. Word choice reflects a collegiate vocabulary.
Conventions (Grammar & Mechanics)

R Poor

The writer demonstrates minimal control of the conventions of written English. Errors are frequent and interfere with meaning.
1 Fair

The writer demonstrates sufficient control of the conventions of written English. Errors may interfere with meaning, but are not distracting
2 Good

The writer demonstrates knowledge of the conventions of written English. Errors are minor and do not interfere with meaning.
3 Advanced

The writer demonstrates full command of the conventions of written English language. No errors are evident.
Exceeds

The writer demonstrates full and sophisticated command of the conventions of written English language. No errors are evident.
Format (Following Guidelines)

R Poor

Does not adhere to formatting guidelines.
1 Fair

Little adherence to formatting guidelines.
2 Good

Some adherence to formatting guidelines.
3 Advanced

Adheres to formatting guidelines.
Exceeds

Adheres to formatting guidelines.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16