Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Unit Guide | Presentation Team rubric

iRubric: Unit Guide | Presentation Team rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Unit Guide \| Presentation Team Unit Guide \| Presentation Team The Presentation Team must present their unit guide, as a team, to the class. Each member of the presentation team must choose PowerPoint, Keynote, iMovie, or a Podcast to present the assigned terms. You will earn a grade that reflects the accuracy and detail of your historical research, and the quality of the presentation of your terms. Students on the presentation team must prepare a storyboard/script that reflects the textual, audio and visual content of the presentation for the teacher, and for each member of their team. You must attach a “Works Cited” section to your storyboard/script. You must utilize at least two sources per term. You may not use the same source more than twice for your portion of the assignment. In addition to an individual grade for the research and the presentation, each student on the presentation team will earn a team collaboration grade. The team collaboration grade will be based on how effectively you perform your role as a member of the team. Rubric Code: CX82WA4 By jbyrd9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Unit Guide \| Presentation Team
	Outstanding 5 pts	Excellent 4 pts	High Achievement 3 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Minimal Achievement 1 pts	NOTES: (N/A)
Historical \| Factual Detail Degree of Accuracy \| Completeness of Factual Information	Outstanding Extensively developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, completely accurate with regard to historical/factual information	Excellent Fully developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of term(s), accurate with regard to historical/factual information	High Achievement Sufficiently developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, mostly accurate with regard to historical/factual information	Satisfactory Partially developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, somewhat inaccurate with regard to historical/factual information	Minimal Achievement Vague and/or confused definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, inaccurate with regard to historical/factual information	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Historical \| Factual Detail Quality of Factual Detail \| Depth \| Degree of Linkage of Detail to Unit Topic	Outstanding Specific, illustrative and supportive historical/ factual detail, both exceptional and concise with regard to depth, each term is, through entirely relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Excellent Specific and supportive historical/factual detail, excellent with regard to depth, each term is, through relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	High Achievement Adequate historical/factual detail, sufficient with regard to depth, each term is, through mostly relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Satisfactory Limited historical/factual detail, superficial with regard to depth, most terms are, through mostly relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Minimal Achievement Distinctly underdeveloped historical/factual detail, superficial with regard to depth, some terms are, through insufficiently relevant detail, minimally linked to the unit of study	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Subject Knowledge Demonstrated Knowledge of Subject \| Topic \| Assignment Requirements	Outstanding Specific, illustrative, supportive, and extensively developed detail, demonstrates a complete understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study, provides clear explanation and elaboration, exceeds expectations	Excellent Specific, supportive, and fully developed detail, demonstrates a thorough understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study, answers all questions with some elaboration, fully meets expectations	High Achievement Adequate, and sufficiently developed detail, demonstrates a good understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study, answers most questions but unable to elaborate, meets expectations	Satisfactory Limited, and partially developed detail, demonstrates partial understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study, appears uncomfortable with information, answers only most basic questions	Minimal Achievement Underdeveloped, vague, confusing detail, demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study, demonstrates little understanding of subject, cannot answer questions about subject	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Preproduction \| Script Sequence-Organization (Graphics\|Text) \| Transitions \| Text Elements \| Grammar \| Sentence-Paragraph Structure \| Spelling	Outstanding No grammatical/ mechanical errors, exceptionally clear, logical, sophisticated organization of content including transitions, presentation is completely consistent with script content	Excellent No significant grammatical/ mechanical errors, clear organization of content though transitions are reasonably smooth they could be improved, presentation is mostly consistent with script	High Achievement Few, if any, grammatical/ mechanical errors, sufficient organization of content, some transitional problems exist and could be improved, presentation varies somewhat from the script	Satisfactory Grammatical/ mechanical errors interfere somewhat with understanding, satisfactory with regard to organization of content, transitions are problematic, presentation varies from script	Minimal Achievement Repeated grammatical/ mechanical errors profoundly interfere with understanding, minimal level of achievement with regard to organization of content, insufficient attention to formatting instructions,	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Audio \| Visual \| Delivery Oral Presentation\| Graphics \| Fonts \| Color \| Music \| General Appearance	Outstanding Audio-visual elements are consistently superior, enthusiastic tone, consistent volume, delivered at a natural speed, music enhances presentation, graphics are relevant and demonstrate a deep understanding of subject, superior graphics always consistent with text, creativity is evident	Excellent Audio-visual elements of presentation are excellent, enthusiastic tone, appropriate volume, and speed of delivery are maintained, music enhances presentation, graphics are relevant and demonstrate a fairly complete understanding of subject, excellent graphics consistent with text, creativity is evident	High Achievement High level of achievement with regard to audio-visual elements, tone, volume, speed are appropriate, music appropriate with regard to theme, graphics relevant, demonstrate a good understanding of subject, mostly consistent with text	Satisfactory Satisfactory level of achievement with regard to audio-visual elements, tone, volume, speed are are inconsistent, music somewhat inappropriate with regard to theme, graphics relevant, demonstrate satisfactory understanding of subject, graphics somewhat consistent with text	Minimal Achievement Minimal level of achievement with regard to audio-visual elements, tone, volume, speed are inconsistent, music is inappropriate with regard to theme, graphics demonstrate lack of understanding, graphics inconsistent with text	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Sources Degree of Organization \| Effective Use of Sources \| Citations	Outstanding Logical, sophisticated organization of content, exceptional depth and completely accurate historical/factual information indicates extensive use of sources, sources used effectively rather than copied, citations are varied, and perfectly formatted	Excellent Thorough organization of content, excellent depth and accurate historical/factual information indicates use of a variety of sources, sources used effectively rather than copied, citations are varied, and properly formatted	High Achievement Sufficient organization of content, sufficient and functional depth and accuracy of historical/factual information indicates some use of sources beyond the minimum requirement, sources used effectively, citations are sufficiently formatted	Satisfactory Limited organization of content, partial development of historical/factual detail, and/or superficial nature of depth indicates that a sufficient variety of sources were probably not used, citation formatting needs to be improved	Minimal Achievement Distinct lack of organization, underdeveloped historical/factual detail and insufficient depth indicate an inadequate attempt to use source material effectively, citations missing and/or mostly improperly formatted	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________

Keywords:

Unit Guide | Presentation Team Evaluation

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More History rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98