Skip to main content
iRubric: Web Design Assignment rubric

iRubric: Web Design Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Web Design Assignment 
In this Project you will design a website using the Kompozer website authoring software. Your webpages and the site must meet the criteria of the rubric. At the end of this assignment you should have successfully designed a (potentially) fully operational website that you can share (if you choose).
Rubric Code: CX7CXA2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Kompozer Website Project
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Needs Improvement

2 pts

Meets Expectations

3 pts

Exceeds Expectations

4 pts

Kompozer

Did you use the Kompozer tools appropriately to meet the page and website goals for design, embed, layout, etc.

Unacceptable

Student included only one or two basic features, with no background, no layout, no embed of other content.
Needs Improvement

Student used basic Kompozer features, but only a few of them - layout and/or background color, and/or images, but no embedded items or multimedia content was used.
Meets Expectations

Student used basic elements of Kompozer for layout, background color, and images. Student did not use features such as HTML, embedded or multimedia content.

Students' pages did not coordinate well in terms of layout and design with the rest of the class.
Exceeds Expectations

Student used Kompozer effectively to create an appropriate and coordinated layout, background, and color scheme. Student used Kompozer features to add HTML, embedded content, multimedia content.

Student worked with class to ensure his/her work coordinated with the rest of the class.
Text and Background

Are the text, background, and overall layout well structured coordinated and consistent across pages?

Unacceptable

Text and backgrounds conflict to a high degree, distracting and difficult to read.
Needs Improvement

Text and background pages complement each other, and also coordinate with the other pages in the site - but with numerous conflicts.
Meets Expectations

Text and background pages complement each other, and also coordinate with the other pages in the site - but with a few conflicts.
Exceeds Expectations

Text and background pages, and layout are well structured, complement each other, and are well coordinated with the other pages in the site.
Content

Does the content adequate, informative, and interesting?

Unacceptable

Content is minimal. no citations or credit given to contributors.
Needs Improvement

Content is adequate but uninteresting to read, or too complicated or unclear. Citations and credit is not given.
Meets Expectations

Content is of appropriate and adequate length, is informative, and is presented in a way that makes it easy or fun to read. Credit and citations are incomplete and only sometimes provided.
Exceeds Expectations

Content is thorough and complete, and of adequate langth, fully addresses the goals of the page and the website and does so in a way that is fun and easy to read. Full citations are provided when and where necessary.
Graphics

Do the graphics appropriately and adequately support the page and website content

Unacceptable

Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader
Needs Improvement

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of good quality
Meets Expectations

Graphics are related to the theme.purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding
Exceeds Expectations

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are thoughtfully cropped, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Navigation Orientation

Is there a standard menu on every page? Does the menu lead to the appropriate pages?

Unacceptable

Menu buttons and/or links are missing from the page.

Unable to determine location of page within website.
Needs Improvement

Menu is missing, and/or buttons and links do not match the site content they are supposed to lead to.

There is some consistency of menu design from page to page.
Lack of consistent design makes it challenging to find and view your page, or to determine its location.

Your pages is not consistently linked to other pages, and your page links to only a few of the other pages.
Meets Expectations

Menu is incomplete, or the name and/or location of buttons and links is somewhat confusing to use or locate.

There is some consistency of menu design from page to page. Able to determine location on most pages.

There are menu links to and from most pages, and most pages list your page link.

It is usually easy to locate your page within the entire site.
Exceeds Expectations

Menu buttons and links easy to locate and follow.

There is consistency of menu design from page to page. We are able to determine location on all pages.

There are menu links to and from each page, and your page is listed on all pages of the site.

It is easy to locate and link to your page, from any other page on the site.
Links

Are there links to appropriate outside sources, and to pages within the site?

Unacceptable

Numerous broken links. Links do not lead to appropriate sites or pages.
Needs Improvement

Some links hard to identify. Or links are not working. Links often lead to the wrong sites, or to inappropriate sites.
Meets Expectations

Most links work.The links usually lead to appropriate sources, and other pages in the site.
Exceeds Expectations

All links work and are easy to identify. They lead appropriate sources or other pages within the site.
Professional Look and Feel

Did the student participate in presenting the website? Did the class communicate effectively to create a professional look and feel to the overall site?

Unacceptable

Design and development effort is inconsistent. Attention to planning and details not evident. The web pages are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.

There is no consistency within the individual's page, or across pages.

Student did not contribute to the presentation.
Needs Improvement

The web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.

Students did not work together to develop an overall theme and design, most students did not adhere to the design principles of the whole site.

Student did not participate in the presentation.
Meets Expectations

The web pages have an attractive and usable layout. it is easy to locate all important elements.

Some students worked together to coordinate the look and feel of the site, and most students did their part to maintain and coordinate with others.

Student participated in the presentation.
Exceeds Expectations

The website has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.

Students worked together to create a design that worked for the whole website, and each student did his part to maintain the coordinated look and feel.

Student participated in the presentation.



Keywords:
  • Web design, webpage,

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16