Skip to main content
iRubric: J&H Psychoanalytical/Argumentative Essay Rubric

iRubric: J&H Psychoanalytical/Argumentative Essay Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
J&H Psychoanalytical/Argumentative Essay Rubric 
Rubric Code: C2WW5X9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric J&H Research Paper
  Excellent

A Range

5 pts

Good

B Range

4 pts

Fair

C Range

2 pts

Poor

D/F Range

1 pts

Content & Structure

Excellent

-Thesis is appropriately complex (argument vs. observation)
--Topic is clearly defined, developed and elaborated on throughout paper.
-Clear and appropriate organization, with effective topic sentences, transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
-All information is analyzed thoughtfully, not just summarized.
-Literary techniques are skillfully incorporated to enhance argument.
Good

-Thesis presents an argument, though it may lack appropriate complexity.
--Topic is defined but not developed and elaborated on throughout paper.
-Organization, transitions, introduction, topic sentences, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Most information is analyzed, some just summarized.
-Literary techniques are present but do not necessarily enhance argument.
Fair

-Thesis is present, but it lacks an argument.
-Topic is mentioned throughout paper, but is not developed.
-Organization, transitions, introduction, topic sentences, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Some information is analyzed, much is just summarize.
-Literary techniques are rarely present and do not enhance argument.
Poor

-Thesis is not present or is unidentifiable.
-Topic is not clear throughout paper and is not developed.
-Organization, transitions, introduction, topic sentences, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Information is merely stated or summarized.
-Literary techniques are not mentioned.
Grammar and Mechanics

Excellent

-Sentences are well constructed without using repetitive ideas throughout paper; a variety of types are used.
-Few or no errors in mechanics, grammar, usage, or spelling (including pronouns, contractions, and number).
-Word choice is consistently careful and precise.
Good

-Most sentences are well constructed without using repetitive ideas throughout paper; a variety of types are used.
-There may be a few minor errors in mechanics, grammar, usage, or spelling. (including pronouns, contractions, and number).
-Word choice is usually careful and precise, and indicates a maturing personal style.
Fair

-Many sentences are well constructed, but there may be some errors; there is little variety in the types that are used.
-There are numerous errors in mechanics, grammar, usage, or spelling. (including pronouns, contractions, and number).
-Word choice is general, vague, or imprecise.
Poor

-Few sentences are well constructed; many have no structure and/or are incomplete.
-There are numerous errors in mechanics, grammar, usage, or spelling. (including pronouns, contractions, and number).
-Word choice is often incorrect.
Quality of research

Excellent

-Cites 3 or more sources.
-Sources are reliable and properly evaluated.
-All information relevant to topic
-Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
Good

-Cited fewer than 3 sources.
-Sources are mostly reliable.
-Citation errors minor.
-Most information relevant to topic.
-Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
Fair

-Failed to cite sources.
-Source reliability is questionable.
-Information provided to support some elements of topic.
Poor

-Failed to cite sources
-Source reliability is clearly unacceptable.
-Information provided supports few elements of topic.
Works Cited/Citations

Excellent

-All sources properly cited in both paper and reference page.
-No errors in format or punctuation.
-In-text citations are consistently introduced in varying and effective ways.
Good

-All sources properly cited in both paper and reference page.
Few errors in format or punctuation.
-In-text citations are mostly introduced in varying and effective ways.
Fair

-Not all sources properly cited in both paper and reference page.
-Several errors in format or punctuation.
-In-text citations are rarely introduced in varying and effective ways.
Poor

-Most sources not properly cited in paper and/or reference page.
-Citations are riddled with errors in format or punctuation.
-In-text citations are not introduced in varying and effective ways.



Keywords:
  • Research paper







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98