Skip to main content
iRubric: Hatchet Writing assessment rubric

iRubric: Hatchet Writing assessment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Hatchet Writing assessment 
Hatchet Writing assessment
Students were to write the last chapter to the book Hatchet. A minimum of 1.5 pages, double spaced in size 12 font is required.
Rubric Code: BXW86W3
By ksmith2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Hatchet Creative Writing
Elements of Response to Literature
 

Exceeds Standard

4 pts


Meets Standard

3 pts


Approaches
Standard

2 pts


Needs instruction

1 pts


Needs remediation

0 pts

Goes beyond retelling

4

Clearly recounts the events in the story in an organized manner. States the characters, setting, events, and problem/solution.
3

Recounts the events in the story in an organized manner. States the characters, setting, events, and problem/solution.
2

Somewhat recounts the events in the story in an organized manner. States the characters, setting, events, and problem/solution.
1

Attempts to recount the events in the story. May loosely state one or two of the following: characters, setting, events, and prob./sol.
0

Does not attempt to retell the story.
Details

Provides enough detail from the text so the reader can understand the interpretation.
4

Elaborates on big ideas or important details so the reader gets a clear understanding of the text.
3

Clearly references or states big ideas or important details so the reader gets an understanding of the text.
2

Somewhat states big ideas or important details so the reader gets a partial understanding of the text.
1

Attempts to state the big ideas or important details of the text. Typically leaves parts out and confuses the reader.
0

Includes unimportant details and ideas from the text (extraneous details). Leaves reader confused.
Supports

Supports interpretation by making specific references to the text.
4

Provides substantial evidence from the work to strongly support the interpretation or evaluation and/or assertions about the meaning and/or quality. May have quotations to support.
3

Provides adequate evidence from the work to support the interpretation or evaluation and/or assertions about the meaning and/or quality. May have quotations to support.
2

Provides limited evidence from the work to support the interpretation or evaluation and/or assertions about the meaning and/or quality. Might have quotations.
1

Attempts to provide evidence from the work to support the interpretation or evaluation and/or assertions about the meaning and/or quality. Typically doesn’t have quotations.
0

Does not use evidence from the work to support evaluation or interpretation.
Response

Writes a response to literature that demonstrates understanding of the text, formulates an opinion, and supports a judgment.
4

Demonstrates a deep & comprehensive understanding by focusing on “big ideas.” Summary provides thorough details so that the reader can understand the summary. Clearly forms an opinion, and supports a judgment.
3

Demonstrates an adequate & deep understanding by focusing on “big ideas.” Summary provides adequate details so that the reader can understand the summary. Forms an opinion, and supports a judgment.
2

Demonstrates a literal understanding by focusing on “big ideas.” Summary provides details so that the reader can understand the summary. May or may not form an opinion and/or judgment.
1

Demonstrates limited understanding of the text. Typically does not form an opinion and/or judgment.
0

Demonstrates some superficial understanding of the work. Does not focus on “big ideas.” Limited or no summary given. Reader would not understand the work. No opinion or judgment made.
Makes connections

Makes connections between the text and his/her own ideas and life
4

Makes a clear, logical text to self, text to text, or text to world connection.
3

Makes a clear text to self, text to text, or text to world connection.
2

Makes a weak text to self, text to text, or text to world connection
1

Attempts to make a text to self, text to text, or text to world connection.
0

No connection attempted.
Conventions

Uses standard English conventions
4

Text is free of convention errors; text has been edited specifically for spelling, punctuation, and capitalization
3

Text is relatively free of errors; text has been edited for spelling, punctuation, and capitalization
2

Errors do not impede understanding; some evidence of editing
1

Errors impede understanding; little evidence of editing
0

Errors preclude comprehension



Keywords:
  • Hatchet, ELA, Creative Writing, Novel Study

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16