iRubric: Teamwork Values Rubric

No clearly-defined roles

Not clear who completed which tasks and/or very uneven distribution of work

Team members not collaborative

Time management is poor or purely directed by the coach

Loose role assignments

Uneven work distribution

Team members will help each other, if asked

Time management skills are weak

Defined roles

Work is distributed fairly – but with individual focus only

Team members assist each other without being asked

Team mentions learning time management

Clearly defined roles

Workload is distributed fairly and team members understand each other’s role

Team members fill each other’s roles (happily!), if needed

Team members give concrete examples of learning time management

A problem was identified, but no steps were taken to identify a solution

One team member used power to reach their desired outcome

One person’s ideas are used

Team members working against each other

Coercion and/or confrontation dominate

A problem was identified, but the chosen solution was inadequate to some team members

Some team members didn’t accept the solution

Simple majority had input at meetings

Decisions made by simple majority without collaborative discussion

Team coexists peacefully

A problem was identified and there is compromise evident in the solution

Team tested various solutions to solve the problem

Cooperation is a dominant theme

Decisions made by most of the team, however focuses on individual tasks

Team collaborates well

A problem was identified and the team worked together to find a solution

Various solutions were tested and then incorporated

Team accepts input from all and sses the big picture in their overall goals

Team members show equality and value each other’s roles by decisions being made by the entire team

Collaboration and co-ownership are dominant themes with the members recognizing interdependence

No clear enthusiasm for science, engineering or technology

Team doesn’t mention new skills acquired

Some members show an interest in science, engineering or technology

Limited attention paid to new skills acquired

Team shows a keen interest in subject matter, but limited use of concrete examples

Team implies new skills acquired

Group articulates a clear understanding of the project experience

Team gives concrete examples of new skills acquired and their interest in the subject areas