Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Prototyping rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Prototyping
Prototyping
This is the rubric for grading the Prototyping section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by JM, v2.0, revised 03/12 by DP, v3.0, revised 08/12 by the department)
Rubric Code:
BX96B38
By
cyoungiwcc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Prototyping
Exemplary/Excellent
5 pts
Accomplished/Good
4 pts
Developing/Fair
3 pts
Deficient/Poor
2 pts
Documentation
Drawings
Schematics
Flowcharts
Code Listings
Exemplary/Excellent
Drawings and specifications are accurate, organized, complete and furnished in electronic format.
All code is properly commented and flowcharted.
Accomplished/Good
Documentation is accurate and complete but not properly organized. For example does not use standard symbols or orthographic views do not adhere to standard conventions.
Developing/Fair
Documentation is incomplete or inaccurate. For example dimensions are missing or are overspecified.
Deficient/Poor
Documentation is incomplete, inaccurate and not properly organized.
Fit & Function Review
Exemplary/Excellent
Computer simulation tools, physical models, component mock-ups have been used to validate component fit or function prior to prototype implementation.
Accomplished/Good
Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair
Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor
Deficiencies in Fit & Function Review necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Material / Component Selection
Exemplary/Excellent
Material or component options were thoroughly researched and compared for best fit to design requirements.
Accomplished/Good
Deficiencies in Material/Component selection did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair
Deficiencies in Material/Component selection resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor
Deficiencies in Material/Component selection necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Fabrication process plan
Exemplary/Excellent
Fabrication process plan was sufficient to allow prototype to be fabricated as planned.
Process plan formulated and reviewed with advisor or technician prior to starting fabrication.
Accomplished/Good
Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan did not result in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness but impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation.
Developing/Fair
Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan resulted in prototype deficiencies sufficient to impact the prototype’s usefulness and impacted the cost and effort involved in implementation. A restart was not required.
Deficient/Poor
Deficiencies in the fabrication process plan necessitated a restart in prototype implementation.
Product Quality Workmanship
Exemplary/Excellent
Finished prototype is well constructed, accurately fabricated to specifications, fully functional and suitable for design verification.
Accomplished/Good
Finished prototype has implementation/fabrication deficiencies but is of sufficient quality to verify design.
Developing/Fair
Finished prototype has implementation/fabrication deficiencies that degrade the ability to verify the design.
Deficient/Poor
Finished prototype is so poorly constructed that it is not suitable for design verification.
Keywords:
IPC, Integrated Project Projects, prototyping
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.