- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: So You Think You Can Be A Citizen? Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
So You Think You Can Be A Citizen? Rubric Rubric Code: BX887WA By ljimenez2015 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Political Science Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Standards
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts
LAFS.8.W.2.6	Poor Poor The student does not show any evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.	Fair Fair The student shows minimal evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.	Good Good The student shows an adequate amount of evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.	Excellent Excellent The student effectively shows evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.
SS.8.C.1.1	Poor Poor The student does not include any of the steps of naturalization in their final result. The project describes only their own exam.	Fair Fair The student includes very few steps or inaccurate steps in their project along with their own citizenship exam questions.	Good Good The student accurately includes the steps of naturalization in their final project, but may be missing an important detail or a step.	Excellent Excellent The student effectively includes all steps of naturalization and all the important details.
Video Presentation	Poor Poor Student did not submit a video presentation or the presentation was not relevant to what was asked of the student.	Fair Fair The student failed to include their own questions in a video format, but submitted it in a different way.	Good Good The presentation was submitted in video format, with accurate depictions of their exam and in a creative way that displayed what they learned, but may have been missing a few key points.	Excellent Excellent The presentation was submitted in video format, with accurate depictions of their exam and in a creative way that displayed what they learned.
Clarity	Poor Poor The presentation is filled with media errors that show that the student did not revise their video at all before showing it to the class.	Fair Fair The presentation has more than just a few media errors that show that the student revised their video too quickly before showing it to the class.	Good Good The presentation has 1 or 2 media errors that show that the student did revise the video before showing it to the class.	Excellent Excellent The presentation has no media errors that show that the student definitely did revise their video before showing it to the class.