Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: STD/STI Parody Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
STD/STI Parody Rubric
STD/STI Rubric
Students are given an STI to research and present to the class through a parody. Information to be included: name of the disease (viral, bacterial, etc), symptoms, treatment, transmission, and prevention. A written copy of the lyrics will be submitted upon conclusion of the presentation.
Rubric Code:
BX82W87
By
psstdeb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Health
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
STD/STI Rubric
Great
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Type of Disease
Great
-Includes the specific type of disease, with its specific strand name, whether it be a bacteria, virus, or other (which is specified)
Good
-Includes type but the strand is wrong
-Does not specify other (if applicable)
Poor
-Includes a type, but the strand is not listed.
-Does not specify other (if applicable)
Needs Improvement
-Incorrect information
Unacceptable
-Failure to specify the given disease
Signs and Symptoms
Great
-Gives a detailed description of the signs and symptoms of the disease
Good
-Give some details of signs and symptoms of disease
Poor
-Gives limited details of the symptoms of the disease
Needs Improvement
-Incorrect information given
Unacceptable
-No symptoms mentioned
Treatment/Cure
Great
-Gives detailed description of the treatment/cure related to the disease
-Can provide many examples to further enhance understanding.
Good
-Gives some details of the treatment/cure related to the disease.
-Can provide few examples to further enhance understanding.
Poor
-Gives few details of the treatment/cure related to the disease
-Does not understand information and cannot provide examples.
Needs Improvement
-Gives limited details of the treatment/cure related to the disease
-Incorrect information
Unacceptable
-No treatment/cure mentioned
Transmission
Great
-Gives a detailed description of the factors contributing to the contraction of the disease.
-Provides many examples
Good
-Gives a some details of the factors contributing to the contraction of the disease.
-Provides some examples
Poor
-Gives a few details of the factors contributing to the contraction of the disease.
-Provides one examples
Needs Improvement
-Gives false details of the factors contributing to the contraction of the disease.
Unacceptable
-No mention of transmission
Prevention
Great
-Provides a detailed description of how this disease can be prevented.
-Fully understands information.
-Provides many examples
Good
-Provides some details regarding the prevention of this disease.
-Somewhat understands information.
-Provides some examples
Poor
-Provides few details regarding prevention of this disease.
-Does not under information
-Cannot provide any examples.
Needs Improvement
-Incorrect information
Unacceptable
-No mention of prevention
Organization and Effort
Great
-Student presents information in a logical, interesting and fun way in which the audience can follow. It is obvious that the student is well prepared for the presentation.
Good
-Student presents information in a logical sequence which the audience can follow. The student spent a significant amount of time preparing for the presentation.
Poor
-Audience has difficulty following presentation because student is silly and fools around. The student spent a moderate amount of time preparing for the presentation.
Needs Improvement
-Audience cannot understand presentation because the information is lost through the silliness of inappropriate behavior. The students spent little time preparing for the presentation.
Unacceptable
-The student showed little effort in completing this assignment.
Verbal Presentation
Great
-Student use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that the person sitting in the back of the classroom can hear them.
Good
-Voice is clear
-Student pronounces most words correctly.
-Most audience members can hear the presentation
Poor
-Voice is low
-Students incorrectly pronounce terms.
-Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Needs Improvement
-Student mumbles.
-Incorrectly pronounces terms
-Only the members directly in front of the presenter can hear the presentation.
Unacceptable
-Student refuses to present his/her parody
Hard Copy
Great
-Lyrics nicely written and submitted following the presentation.
Good
Lyrics nicely written and submitted after class has ended.
Poor
Lyrics written haphazardly on paper and submitted following the presentation.
Needs Improvement
Lyrics written haphazardly and submitted late.
Unacceptable
Lyrics not submitted
Subjects:
Health
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.