- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Research Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Research Presentation Research Paper and Presentation Presentation Guidelines The presentation must have all of the required information. The presentation must cite all academic sources. Grades will be assigned using points based on: 1. Completeness and accuracy of information 2. citation of sources, 3. accuracy in spelling, grammar, and proper format, clear verbal and visual communication of the information, and 4. Level of participation as measured by other group members. Rubric Code: BX78697 By sherigrace Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Research & Presentation
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Completeness of Information 25 %	Poor Most required information was missing.	Fair Some required information was included.	Good All required information was included.	Excellent All required information was included, and extra information as well.
Mechanics. Appearance, Clarity 25 %	Poor Difficulty with oral communication, writing mechanics and presentation format made the presentation very difficult to understand or follow.	Fair The presentation involved a somewhat unclear explanation of the information, some use of graphics.	Good The presentation involved a mostly clear explanation of the information including adequate mechanics and some visual appeal.	Excellent Well-informed, clear explanation of information involving few mechanical errors.
Works Cited 25 %	Poor No academic sources used and/or cited.	Fair Few academic sources used to support research topic and information; substitution of academic sources with basic web research.	Good Some academic sources were used and cited to validate included information.	Excellent All academic sources to substantiate information presented were cited in the presentation in the correct format.
Participation 25 %	Poor No collaboration with the presentation team was noted by group members.	Fair Little collaboration with the presentation team was noted by group members.	Good Some collaboration with the presentation team was noted by group members.	Excellent Full collaboration with the presentation team was noted by group members..