Skip to main content
iRubric: Discussion Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Rubric 
Rubric Code: B5687W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Discussion
Enter rubric description
  Advanced

Evaluation ? Synthesis

4 pts

Basic

Application ? Analysis

2.5 pts

Bellow Basic

Knowledge ? Comprehension

1 pts

Information Management

Enter description

Advanced

Participants consistently make use of specific and accurate knowledge, honest personal experiences, textual references and data

Participants provide ample and convincing evidence for claims and arguments

Participants access a wide variety of current sources of information

Participants provide accurate summaries or analyses of comments made by others and use those interpretations to strengthen or develop their own positions
Basic

Participants make use of specific and accurate knowledge, honest personal experiences, textual references and data

Participants provide evidence for claims and arguments

Participants access a variety of current sources of information

Participants provide accurate summaries or analyses of comments made by others
Bellow Basic

Participants may not always make use of specific and accurate knowledge, honest, personal experiences, textual references and data

Participants may not always provide evidence for claims and arguments

Participants may not always access a variety of current sources of information

Participants may not always provide accurate summaries or analyses of comments made by others
Applied Reasoning

Enter description

Advanced

Participants use rational strategies to present convincing arguments and draw conclusions that have great force

Participants challenge the quality of each other’s reasoning with logical objections and factual references

Participants use logic to illuminate inaccurate interpretations or analyses of data, evidence or textual references
Basic

Participants use rational strategies to present arguments and draw conclusions

Participants challenge the quality of each other’s reasoning

Participants make a distinction between what is known (and said) and the use of that knowledge (i.e., accurate information can be incorrectly interpreted or applied)
Bellow Basic

Participants do not always use rational strategies to present arguments or draw conclusions

Participants do not always challenge the quality of each other’s reasoning

Participants may not always make a distinction between what is known (and said) and the use of that knowledge

Participants may resort to attacking the person and not his or her ideas
Community Building 1

Enter description

Advanced

Participants create an environment that encourages others to risk sharing their ideas, feelings, experiences and theories.

Participants are deeply engaged in talk for long periods of time

Participants listen attentively to one another, providing appropriate feedback and positive body language

Participants ask thoughtful questions aimed at clarifying or expanding a proposition
Basic

Participants are willing to risk sharing their ideas, feelings, experiences and theories.

Participants are engaged in talk

Participants listen attentively

Participants ask questions aimed at clarifying or expanding a proposition
Bellow Basic

Participants are not willing to risk sharing their ideas, feelings, experiences and theories.

Participants are not always engaged in talk

Participants do not always listen attentively

Participants do not frequently ask clarifying questions
Community Building 2

Advanced

Participants encourage the group to remain focused on the purpose of the discussion

Participants incorporate other perspectives as a means of increasing understanding.

Participants advocate a moral, ethical or intellectual position
Basic

Participants remain focused on the purpose of the discussion

Participants acknowledge other perspectives as a means of increasing understanding.

Participants take a moral, ethical or intellectual position
Bellow Basic

Participants do not always remain focused on the purpose of the discussion

Participants do not always acknowledge other perspectives as a means of increasing understanding.

Participants are not willing to take a moral, ethical or intellectual position
Leadership

Advanced

Participants take a leadership role in establishing group norms for taking turns, holding the floor, passing turns, interrupting or sharing conversational leadership.
Basic

Participants observe group norms for appropriate language, taking turns, holding the floor, passing turns, interrupting, or sharing conversational leadership.
Bellow Basic

Participants do not always observe group norms for appropriate language, taking turns, holding the floor, passing turns, interrupting, or sharing conversational leadership.



Keywords:
  • Discussion

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16