Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Paper Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Paper Rubric
Research Paper Rubric
Research the approved topic. Submit a 3-5 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a works cited with at least 4 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code:
AXW586B
By
garmida
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
4
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
1
(N/A)
Quality of research
4
--Cited 4 or more sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
3
--Cited 4 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficient depth.
2
--Failed to cite 4 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
1
--Failed to cite sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Content
4
--Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Claim and counterclaim were clearly addressed.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--Shows changes in thinking process throughout entire project.
3
--Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research.
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Appropriately supports claim, while mentioning the counterclaim.
2
--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Little support to claim and does not mention the counterclaim.
1
--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Works Cited/Bibliography
4
--All sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
--Nearly flawless in format.
3
--All sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
-- Few errors in format.
2
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
-- Many errors in format.
1
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
-- Format is largely incorrect.
Grammar and Mechanics
4
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
3
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--Some errors in spelling, agreement, and punctuation, but they do not interfere with understanding.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
2
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--Errors in spelling, agreement, and punctuation that hinders understanding.
--Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
1
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Many errors in spelling, agreement, and punctuation that makes paper largely inaccessible.
--Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
Biology
English
Vocational
Education
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.