Skip to main content
iRubric: Analyzing Experiments Articles - Statistics rubric

iRubric: Analyzing Experiments Articles - Statistics rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analyzing Experiments Articles - Statistics 
Analyzing Experiments - AP Statistics
Evaluation of an article detailing the results of an experiment and relating it to the key concepts of experimental design.
Rubric Code: AX8473W
By behart
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Journal Article Evaluation
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Not attempted

0 pts

Introduction/Summary

Excellent

All main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is written in concisely and the article is cited.
Goal of experiment is stated.
Good

Summary is mostly correct. Some references to article are provided to support summary statements. Goal of experiment is stated.
Fair

Some details from article are missing.Minimal referencing to the article is provided. Experiment goal is missing.
Poor

Summary is very broad with no detail from the article. Experiment goal is missing.
Not attempted

No summary is provided OR the summary is just a copy of part of the article. Experiment goal is missing.
Experimental Design

Excellent

Study design correctly identified and summarized. Subjects or experimental units, treatments, explanatory and response variables are identified. Experimental design principles are noted with evidence.
Good

Study design is not identified, but Subjects, treatments, explanatory and response variables are identified. Experimental design principles are only briefly noted with no evidence presented.
Fair

Only two or three of the parts of the experiment are identified. Experimental design principles are not included.
Poor

Only one or two of the parts of the experiment are identified with little evidence.
Not attempted

Almost all parts of an experiment are missing. OR information is copied directly from the article.
Teacher feedback

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Not attempted
Statistical Analysis

Excellent

Statistical analysis in the article is correctly summarized. Student includes evaluation of the appropriateness of the analysis and of any statistics provided.
Good

Analysis of the article is trivial with little statistical reasoning. Student includes some evaluation of the appropriateness of the analysis and of any statistics provided.
Fair

Analysis of the article is stated but not well supported. Evaluation of appropriateness of the analysis is missing.
Poor

Either analysis of the article or evaluation of the appropriateness of the analysis is missing or not supported with evidence.
Not attempted

No evaluation of statistical analysis or appropriateness of the analysis is given.
Conclusions

Excellent

Correct conclusions from the article stated and evaluated.
Student demonstrates a strong working knowledge of class material on experiments.
Good

Mostly correct conclusions from the article stated and evaluated.
Student demonstrates some working knowledge of class material on experiments.
Fair

Conclusion is missing or is not evaluated.
Poor

Conclusion and evaluation are both missing.
Not attempted

Student does not provide a correct conclusion and does not show knowledge of class material.
Teacher Feedback

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Not attempted
Grammar and Organization

Excellent

Paper is well organized and easy to follow. There are no spelling or grammar errors.
Good

Paper has 2 spelling OR two grammatical errors.
Fair

Paper has 3 - 4 spelling OR 3 - 4 grammatical errors.
Poor

Paper reads like a list instead of like an analysis. OR 5 spelling OR 5 grammatical errors.
Not attempted

Paper is not organized and difficult to follow and there are more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors
Citation

Excellent

The article is correctly cited.
Good

The article citation is mostly correct.
Fair

The citation is incorrect in some parts.
Poor

The citation is completely incorrect.
Not attempted

There is no citation.
Teacher Feedback

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Not attempted



Keywords:
  • article evaluation, statistics



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98