Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Personal Section rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Personal Section rubric
National Local Section rubric
IR Essay
Rubric Code:
AX6C9W7
By
masonj1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Personal
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Very Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Content
Poor
Three of the perspectives have been omitted.
Fair
Two of the content points are missing. One side of the argument is present.
Good
one of the points is missing.
Very Good
One of the points for inclusion is under explained.
Excellent
Use evidence from personal experience such as - using a laptop to learn, setting up a help group online, using social media, what's app to form a study group.
You should mention one positive effect of digital interaction and one negative effect.
End the perspective by giving a personal response on how teens can overcome barriers e.g. too much use of screen time at the expense of relationships, to bridge the individual digital divide.
Critical Reasoning
Poor
A collection of lists from the sources. No line of reasoning connecting component parts. Largely description and no analysis.
Fair
Line of reasoning needs more focus. PEECE unused. Sources either not used or used too closely.
Needs to link the findings to the research question more closely
Good
The line of reasoning is identifiable but a little confused in places. Overuse or underuse of research sources. PEECC is partially used.
Very Good
A somewhat steady line of reasoning. Research sources used and cited. PEECC is evident but not always followed.
Excellent
A secure line of reasoning links the component parts of the section. The research sources have been used selectively to justify a consistent approach. Claim-Counter claim and PEECC have been done.
Subjects:
Humanities
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.