Skip to main content
iRubric: Restaurant Creation Rubric - Using Microsoft Office 2013

iRubric: Restaurant Creation Rubric - Using Microsoft Office 2013

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Restaurant Creation Rubric - Using Microsoft Office 2013 
Restaurant Creation Rubric - Using Microsoft Office 2013
Rubric for Restaurant Simulation Project using Microsoft Office 2013
Rubric Code: AX4WA2A
By JWhiteBSS
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Microsoft Office
  Advanced

Above and Beyond Stuff goes are here.

10 pts

Proficient

Very good and competent materials and effort are here.

8 pts

Basic

Good to Average tend to get scored here.

5 pts

Poor

Underwhelming; scores end up here when there is a lack of effort and results

1 pts

Completion
40 %

Assigned items completed by the student (NOTE:Six items total for group)
Advanced

The assigned item(s) is (are) completed and is turned in by the required date.

The project deliverables match the requested items given to each student at the beginning of the project and includes those items that each group assigns to each respective group member.
Proficient

One of the required items might be incomplete, but is included in the final overall project and is turned in by the required date.

The project deliverables match the requested items given to each student at the beginning of the project and includes those items that each group assigns to each respective group member.
Basic

Two necessary items are incomplete and/or not turned in by the required date.

The project deliverables match the requested items given to each student at the beginning of the project and includes those items that each group assigns to each respective group member.
Poor

More than two items are incomplete and/or not turned in by the required due date.

Items turned in do not match the description and instructions given at the beginning of the project and don't include those items that each group had assigned each group member.
Composition
30 %

Formatting and Organization of the submitted items
Advanced

The item(s) is (are) very organized and easy to read as well as understand.

Information is presented in a visually pleasing manner with regard to stylistic choices and execution.
Proficient

Item(s) is (are) mostly organized.

Some thing might be out of order, but for the most part, it is fairly easy to follow and understand.
Basic

The project seems thrown together.

Some things are organized, some things are not. It is difficult to read and understand.
Poor

The project is not organized and is difficult to understand.

Not much thought was put into the organization and aesthetics of the items submitted.
Competency
15 %

Student's Efficient and Effective use of class time
Advanced

Class time was used extremely well on this project. Everything was turned in on time and the student was clearly on task and never needed redirection.
Proficient

Class time was used well on this project. Everything was turned in on time and the student was mostly on task.

Student had 1 or 2 instances requiring redirection back to task.
Basic

Class time was not used well on this project. Some things were not turned in on time and the student wasn't really on task.

Student had 3 or 4 instances requiring redirection back to task.
Poor

Class time wasn't used well on this project. Most things were not turned in on time and the student was not on task. This resulted in the culminating product from the group not to get completed.

Student required 5 or more instances requiring redirection back to task.
Contribution
15 %

A group member's value to the team goal
Advanced

Student went above and beyond what they were responsible for on the team--if there was a problem, they solved it making the team--and the product better.
Proficient

Student did what they were assigned to do which was more than the other team members.
Basic

Student completed what they were assigned.

This was not a large amount when compared to what others in the group completed.
Poor

Student did not complete what they were assigned to complete by their own team.

Student's lack of completion of their assigned items results in other group members having to pick up the slack to complete the project.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98